Question

翻译成英文,谢谢!

毫无疑问，这种“逆向歧视”在美国从未发生过，也根本不可能在美国发生。尤其是“肯定性行动”原本就是由美国有关机构 中的白人男性构思出来 的，而且“肯定性行动”计划也经常是由 白人男性来主导执行的。
20世纪 90年代美国各界对“逆向歧视”展开了广泛的讨论 ，争论的中心是关于因少数族群获得优先权而使一些 白人无法找到工作或得到提升的问题 ，对“肯定性行动”支持与否已成为理解白人对少数族群感受 的一个标准。社会学家证实 ，大多数美 国白人不赞同“对黑人 的 特别对待”，他们并不认为“政府有责任帮助黑人”。在“逆向歧视”被炒作得沸沸扬扬之际，有一些学者开始就是否存在“逆 向歧视”展开调查研究 ，其研究结果与许多美国白人关于“逆向歧视”的认识大相径庭。这些研究结果均证实 ，从 1970年到 1990年这 20年间男性劳工的种族和族群分层只出现了轻微的变化，也就是说黑人仍基本上居于社会分层的最底层，高居在上的仍是白人男性。研究说明，与“肯定性行动”相关的白人遭受歧视的案例并不多。艾尔弗雷德 •布卢姆罗森(Alfred Blumrosen)提交给劳工部一份关于 1990--1994年间联邦地方法院的大约 3000个有关歧视的裁决的研究报告。布卢姆罗森发现 ，其中涉及到“逆 向歧视”的案例不到一百个 ，即不足 4％。“在不到一百个案例中，也许 20％一30％原告胜诉 ，而其他…… 70％原告败诉。原告败诉的案例基本上是原告声称他们比得到这份工作的黑人或妇女有更好的资历，而在审判结束后法官裁定他们并没有更好的资历。”另外，有关白人男性被歧视的投诉仅占公平就业机会委员会(EEOC)歧视投诉详细 目录的 1．7％。 而且这些调查同时也注意到，有相当多的案例并不符合真正的“逆 向歧视”，大多数案例涉及的是白人对白人男性的不利行动。

Answer 1

There is no doubt that such "reverse discrimination" has never happened in the United States, but also impossible in the United States. Especially the "affirmative action" is originally from the United States in the relevant institutions by the idea of white men, and "affirmative action" program is often dominated by white men to execution.
The 20th century, the United States from all walks of life to the 90's "reverse discrimination" launched a wide-ranging discussion, the center of controversy because of minority groups on the priority of access to a number of whites can not find a job or raise the issue of "affirmative action" to support or not has become to understand the feelings of the white minority groups on a standard. Sociologists confirm that the majority of white Americans do not agree with "the special treatment of black people," they do not believe that "The Government has a responsibility to help black people." In "reverse discrimination" was a time when speculation a lot of heated discussions, some scholars began on the existence of "reverse discrimination" to start research, its findings with a number of white Americans on the "reverse discrimination" different understanding. The results of these studies have confirmed that from 1970 to 1990, the past 20 years, male workers of racial and ethnic stratification only minor changes, that is to say black people are still basically living in the bottom of the social stratification, the highest in the still is a white male. Research shows that with the "affirmative action" related to the case of white people being discriminated against are not many. •布卢姆罗森Alfred (Alfred Blumrosen) submitted to the Labor Department report on the 1990 - 1994 years, the Federal District Court about the 3000 ruling on discrimination studies.布卢姆罗森found, which relates to "reverse discrimination" cases of less than 100, that is, less than 4%. "In less than 100 cases, perhaps 20% a 30% in favor of the plaintiff, while the other ... ... 70% of the plaintiff lost. The plaintiff's case against the plaintiffs claim that they basically get the job than blacks or women have a better qualifications, and after the end of the trial judge ruled that they do not have better qualifications. "In addition, the white, male complaints of discrimination only by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) discrimination complaints against the 1.7 percent inventory. At the same time, these investigations have also noted that a considerable number of cases not in line with the real "reverse discrimination", the majority of cases involved white men on white adverse action.

Answer 2

There is no doubt that such "reverse discrimination" has never happened in the United States, but also impossible in the United States. Especially the "affirmative action" is originally from the United States in the relevant institutions by the idea of white men, and "affirmative action" program is often dominated by white men to execution.
The 20th century, the United States from all walks of life to the 90's "reverse discrimination" launched a wide-ranging discussion, the center of controversy because of minority groups on the priority of access to a number of whites can not find a job or raise the issue of "affirmative action" to support or not has become to understand the feelings of the white minority groups on a standard. Sociologists confirm that the majority of white Americans do not agree with "the special treatment of black people," they do not believe that "The Government has a responsibility to help black people." In "reverse discrimination" was a time when speculation a lot of heated discussions, some scholars began on the existence of "reverse discrimination" to start research, its findings with a number of white Americans on the "reverse discrimination" different understanding. The results of these studies have confirmed that from 1970 to 1990, the past 20 years, male workers of racial and ethnic stratification only minor changes, that is to say black people are still basically living in the bottom of the social stratification, the highest in the still is a white male. Research shows that with the "affirmative action" related to the case of white people being discriminated against are not many. Blume Rowson Alfred (Alfred Blumrosen) submitted to the Labor Department report on the 1990 - 1994 years, the Federal District Court about the 3000 ruling on discrimination studies.Blume Rowson found, which relates to "reverse discrimination" cases of less than 100, that is, less than 4%. "In less than 100 cases, perhaps 20% a 30% in favor of the plaintiff, while the other ... ... 70% of the plaintiff lost. The plaintiff's case against the plaintiffs claim that they basically get the job than blacks or women have a better qualifications, and after the end of the trial judge ruled that they do not have better qualifications. "In addition, the white, male complaints of discrimination only by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) discrimination complaints against the 1.7 percent inventory. At the same time, these investigations have also noted that a considerable number of cases not in line with the real "reverse discrimination", the majority of cases involved white men on white adverse action.

Willing to help you!

Answer 3

No doubt, the "reverse discrimination" in the United States had never happened, also may not happen in America. Especially "affirmative action by the relevant institutions is the white man came up with the idea, and" affirmative action plan also often is dominated by white men to execute.
In the 1990s America "reverse discrimination" on the discussion, the debate about the center is obtained by minorities priority and make some white can not find work or get promoted to the question, "affirmative action" support or not has become the understanding of ethnic minority feelings of white, a standard. Social scientists confirmed, most beautiful white disapprove of the "kingdom of special treatment for blacks, they don't think" government has a responsibility to help black." In the "reverse discrimination" by speculation, have a few scholars began to discrimination against existence ", "investigation research results and many American white about" reverse discrimination "understanding. These findings are confirmed, from 1970 to 1990 the 20 years of racial and ethnic male workers only a slight layer, namely the Negro basically is the bottom of social stratification on high, is still in the white man. Research shows, and "affirmative action" white discrimination case is not much. Alfred bulum discovers rosenborg (Alfred Blumrosen) submitted to the department for 1990-1994 federal courts of approximately 3,000 relevant discrimination ruled the research report. Bloom rosenborg found, which involves "inverse to less than 100 cases of discrimination", namely the shortage of 4%. "In less than one hundred cases, perhaps 20% a 30% plaintiff, while the other... 70% against the plaintiff. The case is basically the plaintiff said they got the job than black or better qualifications, women in the trial and after the judge ruled that they didn't better qualifications." Additionally, the white men were discrimination complaints accounted for only equal employment opportunity commission (EEOC) discrimination complaints detailed catalogue of 1.7 percent. But the survey also noticed that there are quite a few cases do not conform to the "real", to discrimination against most cases involving is white to white male adverse action.

Answer 4

你也太狠了，累死我了。
There is no doubt that such "reverse discrimination" has never happened in the United States, but also impossible in the United States. Especially the "affirmative action" is originally from the United States in the relevant institutions by the idea of white men, and "affirmative action" program is often dominated by white men to execution.

The 20th century, the United States from all walks of life to the 90's "reverse discrimination" launched a wide-ranging discussion, the center of controversy because of minority groups on the priority of access to a number of whites can not find a job or raise the issue of "affirmative action" to support or not has become to understand the feelings of the white minority groups on a standard. Sociologists confirm that the majority of white Americans do not agree with "the special treatment of black people," they do not believe that "The Government has a responsibility to help black people." In "reverse discrimination" was a time when speculation a lot of heated discussions, some scholars began on the existence of "reverse discrimination" to start research, its findings with a number of white Americans on the "reverse discrimination" different understanding. The results of these studies have confirmed that from 1970 to 1990, the past 20 years, male workers of racial and ethnic stratification only minor changes, that is to say black people are still basically living in the bottom of the social stratification, the highest in the still is a white male. Research shows that with the "affirmative action" related to the case of white people being discriminated against are not many. •布卢姆罗森Alfred (Alfred Blumrosen) submitted to the Labor Department report on the 1990 - 1994 years, the Federal District Court about the 3000 ruling on discrimination studies.布卢姆罗森found, which relates to "reverse discrimination" cases of less than 100, that is, less than 4%. "In less than 100 cases, perhaps 20% a 30% in favor of the plaintiff, while the other ... ... 70% of the plaintiff lost. The plaintiff's case against the plaintiffs claim that they basically get the job than blacks or women have a better qualifications, and after the end of the trial judge ruled that they do not have better qualifications. "In addition, the white, male complaints of discrimination only by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) discrimination complaints against the 1.7 percent inventory. At the same time, these investigations have also noted that a considerable number of cases not in line with the real "reverse discrimination", the majority of cases involved white men on white adverse action.

Answer 5

1.成品包装超出卡板外围
Finished
product
packing
should
go
beyond
the
periphery
of
bale.
2.操作人应根据每包产品堆叠高度调整松紧度
(下盖打包高度185-190MM,上盖打包高度152-156MM)
The
operator
should
alter
the
tightness
of
the
packing
according
to
stack
height
(packing
height
for
lower
cover:185-190MM,
and
for
upper
cover
:152-156MM)
3.每30分对油墨粘度测量1次，控制在14±2秒。
Measure
the
viscosity
of
pringting
ink
every
30
minutes,
and
error
of
time
span
should
be
within
14±2
seconds.
4.生产时应按客户提供色卡控制在中限
Products
should
be
controlled
within
middle
limit
according
to
our
customer's
color
card.