Question

帮我翻译段英文，急！在线等！！别用翻译软件，需要语句通顺的。多谢！!

technology cooperation you need. So we have lots of work to do, no question.
Standoff between developed and developing countries:
You see this in Copenhagen, countries made commitments coming to Copenhagen, but then they did not step up to find ways or additional ideas to proposals coming to the table. And you had a very strong feeling that both sides that they won’t get enough from the other. Somehow you have to break through that and get a different dynamic going. There are a hundred reasons for China to be really pushing energy efficiency, to be really pushing the renewable sector. If China can really be driving renewable into its coal production, it will be bold shifting, it’s will be beneficial to both energy security and reducing pollution as well as reducing carbon. I think that will lay the foundation for a huge export industry. And it will be a leader in renewable technologies. And it’s already starting to happen.
And I think we need to see the same thing in the U.S., Europe, and other big players. Unless that being to happen, you can break out the stand off.
Are you optimistic on this issue?
I think we will get to an international agreement. I think we cant in a near term, or next year. To get an international agreement on important pieces of puzzle, I cannot make predictions how long that will take to get to a comprehensive agreement. But it’s really important, in the meantime, we just get going on reducing emissions, or slowing the growth of the emissions in the places that matters. The U.S. and Europe get to find a way to get on an aggressive path to reducing their own emissions. Emerging economies like China and India and Brazil are really going after their energy efficiency, reducing deforestation, driving new energy resources into their own economy, and actually seizing the opportunities to become world leaders in producing new energy technology. Frankly I think the future belongs to the countries who become leaders in that field. There will be a booming industry. There is no question about it. So I think the more the big players are moving to that direction, actually beginning to get sharp progress in reducing emissions, or slow the growth of the emission, I think that likely itself begins to build confidence make it more possible to come together in the international agreement.

Answer 1

你需要的技术合作。因此，我们有很多工作要做，没有问题。
僵局，发达国家和发展中国家之间：
你看这在哥本哈根，各国作出的承诺来哥本哈根，但他们没有找到办法，加强或补充意见的提案来表。和你有一个非常强烈的感觉，双方都认为他们不会从其他不够。不知怎的，你要突破它，让不同的动态去。
中国是有一百个理由要真正推动能源效率，才能真正推动可再生部门。如果中国真的可以驾驶到其煤炭生产可再生能源，这将是大胆的转变，这将有利于能源安全和减少污染以及减少二氧化碳。我认为这将奠定基础
一个巨大的出口产业。这将是一个在可再生能源技术的领导者。而且它已经开始发生。
我认为，我们必须看到，在美国，欧洲同样的事情，和其他大的球员。除非该被发生，你可以摆脱的立场了。
你对这个问题持乐观态度？
我想我们会得到一个国际协议。我认为我们在短期内，或明年倾斜。为了得到一个重要的拼图块的国际协议，我不能作出预测，将需要多长时间到达一个全面的协议。但它非常重要，在此期间，我们就立即前往减少排放量，
或减缓了该事项的地方排放的增长。美国和欧洲得到找到一种方式来获得一个积极的道路上减少自己的排放量。像中国，印度和巴西的新兴经济体真的要经过他们的能源效率，减少森林砍伐，驾驶到自己经济的新能源资源，真正抓住opport
统一体，成为世界各国领导人在生产新能源技术。老实说，我认为未来属于谁的国家成为这一领域的领导者。将有一个蓬勃发展的产业。这是毫无疑问的。因此，我认为越是大公司正在向这个方向，其实开始获得减少排放，或减缓排放增长急剧进展，我觉得可能本身开始建立信任使之更可能出现在一道国际协议。

Answer 2

你需要的技术合作。因此，我们有很多工作要做，没有问题。

僵局，发达国家和发展中国家之间：

你看这在哥本哈根，各国作出的承诺来哥本哈根，但他们没有找到办法，加强或补充意见的提案来表。和你有一个非常强烈的感觉，双方都认为他们不会从其他不够。不知怎的，你要突破它，让不同的动态去。中国是有一百个理由要真正推动能源效率，才能真正推动可再生部门。如果中国真的可以驾驶到其煤炭生产可再生能源，这将是大胆的转变，这将有利于能源安全和减少污染以及减少二氧化碳。我认为这将奠定一个巨大的出口业的基础。这将是一个在可再生能源技术的领导者。而且它已经开始发生。

我认为，我们必须看到，在美国，欧洲同样的事情，和其他大玩家