Question

翻译 在线,请不要用软件翻译，谢谢呀

7.7 The Government wishes to ensure that the relevant information on the use of agency workers is supplied in all the situations where there is a currently an obligation, either explicit or implicit, on employers to provide information on the employment situation. The Government does not consider that normal collective bargaining falls into that category of legal obligation. The Government therefore considers it would be outside the scope of Article 8 to introduce a new requirement on employers to provide information about their use of agency workers in the general context of collective bargaining.
7.8 The draft regulations contain amendments to both the Safety Representative and Safety Committee Regulations 1977 and the Health and Safety (Consultation with Employees) Regulations 1996, the effect of which is to require employers to provide information about agency workers to safety representatives and to representatives of employee safety. In the first consultation, respondents were content with this approach in principle. The Government has however re-examined the case for amending these two sets of health and safety regulation. It notes that employers already have a legal obligation to provide agency workers with information on risks to their health and safety and the measures taken to manage those risks. Additionally, safety representatives and representatives of employee safety should receive, under existing law, a range of information from their employer about safety arrangements for agency workers. For example, the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 (MHSWR) requires employers to assess the risks of his undertaking, including an assessment of risks to "workers not in his employment". The Approved Code of Practice on the MHSWR makes it clear for employers that the position of temporary agency workers must be included in that risk assessment and will need to take account of the views of safety representatives during that process. The Government intends to give further consideration to this issue during the consultation process and respondents are asked to give any views they may have on the suggested provision in this area.

Answer 1

政府希望确保有关机构工作人员使用的是在所有的情况下是目前有义务,明确或隐含在雇主提供信息的就业形势。政府并不认为正常的集体谈判陷入这一类的法定义务。因此认为政府会以外的第8条引入新的要求雇主提供信息的机构工作人员在他们所使用的语境的集体谈判的一般。
条例草案修改7.8级的安全条例和安全委员会代表于1977年,健康和安全条例和员工咨询(1996年),其结果是要求雇主提供信息安全代表机构工作人员,并代表员工的安全。在第一个咨询,受访者满意这个方法的原理。政府已然而重审此案提出修改这两套健康和安全条例。它指出,雇主已经有法律义务向员工提供机构与信息对他们的健康与安全风险管理应采取的措施和风险。此外,安全的代表和代表员工安全应该接受,在现有的法律,雇主的信息安全机构工作人员安排。例如,健康和安全管理工作的规定》(1999)要求用人单位MHSWR评估风险的承担风险的评估,包括“工人不雇佣”。经批准经营守则,在MHSWR明确为雇主的位置临时机构工作人员必须包含在这风险评估,就需要考虑安全性代表的观点在这个过程。政府打算给进一步考虑这个问题,在协商过程中被要求提供任何意见,他们可能已经在这个地区的建议的规定。

Answer 2

7.7政府希望确保，关于对机构的工作人员使用相关的资料是in all的情况下有一个目前是义务，无论是明示或暗示对雇主，提供提供有关的就业情况。政府并不认为正常的集体谈判属于这一类的法律义务。因此，政府认为这将第八条以外的范围，是对雇主提出的新要求，提供有关机构的工作人员利用其在集体谈判的总体情况的信息。
规章草案包括修订既安全代表和安全委员会规例1977年和卫生与安全（与员工协商）规例1996年，其效果是要求雇主提供有关机构的工作人员向安全代表和职工代表的信息安全。在第一次协商，受访者这种做法原则的内容。不过，政府已重新审查了修订规例的健康和安全这两套如此。它指出，雇主已经有法律义务提供有关的健康和安全以及管理这些风险所采取的措施风险的信息机构的工作人员。此外，安全代表和职工代表应得到安全，根据现行法律，从他们对信息的机构的工作人员的安全安排，雇主范围。例如，在卫生工作条例管理和安全1999（MHSWR）规定雇主必须评估他的事业，包括对风险的评估，在其就业“到”工人没有风险。对经批准的工作守则，使明确的MHSWR该临时机构的工作人员必须在该位置的风险评估包括雇主，需要在这一进程中采取的安全代表的意见。政府打算进一步考虑在咨询过程和受访者对这个问题要给予的任何意见，都可能有这方面的建议的规定。