求!帮高手帮我翻译成英语

人是为自己而活。你可以理解为,你依靠父母是为了更好让自己生存,你依赖朋友是因为其有利用价值,你寻找爱人是找个人陪着别太寂寞,只要你这么想,你的确是为自己活着的。。但通常,... 人是为自己而活。你可以理解为,你依靠父母是为了更好让自己生存,你依赖朋友是因为其有利用价值,你寻找爱人是找个人陪着别太寂寞,只要你这么想,你的确是为自己活着的。。
但通常,这个事我们会更希望从感性的角度理解。。人是群居的动物,周围是敌人也好,是朋友也好,都是一种对自身价值的体现。。人生存于世会有需求,有的人只求温饱,有的人很追求理想境界,大展宏图。。这都不光是只为了满足于自己,而其背后有更深的一层含义。。低需求的人他们生活安定了可以使这个社会贫富差距缩小,有利于和谐富足。。而高需求的人,渴望实现人生价值的人呢则有着一种使命感和责任心,把大事化为自身之事渴望实现。。这都说明了人与社会,与自然,与人之间是有或明或暗的联结的。。但凡有联结。。人就不可能把自己独立出去,完全不依靠他物,那么这样说为自己而活就牵强了。。。
但是人还是会经常把这句话放在嘴边上:多为自己考虑考虑,不为别人活而为自己活。。我相信这么说的人并不是说他多自私,而是他看出有一些人,执拗于为着世上不必要的虚名和利益丧失了自我。。。有的人呢为了得那世人颁发的一张好人证书,可以为别人奋不顾身等等。。博得虚名其实无意。。有的人呢则一辈子任人摆布,完全活在别人的控制下,没有自由,这样的理应抗争。。。。自己的生活不让别人控制。。人更应该看清自己的路,别过多干涉别人的路,学着淡然随性一点
不要翻译软件的哦。。 句型可以不用难。。简单就好
展开
鑒尐爺
2010-10-16
知道答主
回答量:12
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:0
展开全部
People live for oneself is. You can understand, you depend on their parents for better let oneself live, because its are on your friends, your value for a lover is someone accompany don't too lonely, as long as you think so, you are indeed for their living.
But usually, the thing we would prefer the view from perceptual..... Man is a social animal, is the enemy or friend, is to oneself is a value. People living in the world, some people will need food, but some people are pursuing ideal realm, policies.emiciont servicea. This is not only to meet in themselves, and have a deeper behind its meanings. Low demand of their life can make the stability of social wealth gap, harmonious rich. And the high demand for people to realize their life values, and the man is a great sense of responsibility, and the desire to own thing. This explains the people and society, between man and nature, and there is the connection. If have connection. People could not put yourself out, don't depend on together, then say to yourself and to live is contrived.
But people often put the words in his mouth: for more than others think that living and live for themselves. I believe that man is not so selfish, but he said he saw some people on earth, positiveness of unnecessary for factory and interest lost self. Some people in the world? A good certificate issued for others, can throw, etc. Accidentally moves actually won. Some people are acted upon, life to live fully in others, not under the control of freedom, so should fight... His life is not allow others to control. People should see his own way, don't too much in the way of others, to interfere with sexual indifferently

看看你看懂不?
这是专家级的
Do0msda丫
2010-10-16 · TA获得超过311个赞
知道小有建树答主
回答量:342
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:130万
展开全部
Every person lives for himself. You may take this as: you depend on your parents in order to live better, you depend on friends in order to take advantage of them, you look for a lover in order to get away form loneliness... as long as you take things in this way, then you really live for yourself. But usually, we prefer to understand this stuff in a sensitive way.Human beings are kind of animals that live together, you may live with enemies or friends,but all these is a reflection of ourselves. People can't live without demands, someone demands for warmth ,someone demands for a bright future..all these things are not for themselves only but there is something behind. It helps the society to be in harmony if the people with lower demands settle down.But to those people with a higher demands, the people with a desire for seccuss has a heart of responsebility.All these things come to an conclusion that human beings to the society,to nature, to everybody around are tied with all kinds of relationships. Then people can't pull themselves out and be totally cut from the other things, and it would be tough to say people are living for themselves.
But people always say: consider for yourself better,do not live for others but yourself. I believe that those people who saying that are not selfish , they are just can't stand that some people are stuck in the fame or benifits that don't belong to them,some people could sacrifice themselves just in order to get a certificate of"GOOD BUDDY", some people living their whole live under the strings which held in others hands, without freedom... people should figure out what they really want and don't set foot in others road, and take things easy.
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
rosehuang123
2010-10-27 · TA获得超过918个赞
知道答主
回答量:62
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:36.3万
展开全部
People live for oneself is. You can understand, you depend on their parents for better let oneself live, because its are on your friends, your value for a lover is someone accompany don't too lonely, as long as you think so, you are indeed for their living.
But usually, the thing we would prefer the view from perceptual..... Man is a social animal, is the enemy or friend, is to oneself is a value. People living in the world, some people will need food, but some people are pursuing ideal realm, policies.emiciont servicea. This is not only to meet in themselves, and have a deeper behind its meanings. Low demand of their life can make the stability of social wealth gap, harmonious rich. And the high demand for people to realize their life values, and the man is a great sense of responsibility, and the desire to own thing. This explains the people and society, between man and nature, and there is the connection. If have connection. People could not put yourself out, don't depend on together, then say to yourself and to live is contrived.
But people often put the words in his mouth: for more than others think that living and live for themselves. I believe that man is not so selfish, but he said he saw some people on earth, positiveness of unnecessary for factory and interest lost self. Some people in the world? A good certificate issued for others, can throw, etc. Accidentally moves actually won. Some people are acted upon, life to live fully in others, not under the control of freedom, so should fight... His life is not allow others to control. People should see his own way, don't too much in the way of others, to interfere with sexual indifferently
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
物食琐道说三1688
2010-10-16
知道答主
回答量:26
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:4.1万
展开全部
Select several artists from either list below or ones you have researched for your recent practical folios as source for an essay. You are to use the following topic as a basis for a comparison of their artworks:
“The success of employing multiples as means of artistic expression isdependent on the refinement each artist displays when manipulating the composition to strengthen and convey meaning”
Your comparative essay must identify and articulate how each of the artists use both the notion of multiples or repetition and composition in their work.
Your discussion should include the following:
1 explanation and justification for your choice of the two artists
2 brief background to the artists that puts their work in some sort of context
3 reference to at least two pieces by each artist that support and illustrates the points you make in your comparison
4 discussion of the key ideas and how those ideas are supported and enhanced by their use of composition
我选的3个artist分别是Andy Warhol, Barbabar Kruger,Rosalie Gascoigne.
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
1160761006
2010-10-16
知道答主
回答量:5
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:0
展开全部
For the job. you can understand, you rely on parents to better their living, you rely on friends because of its value, you are looking for love is to find someone with her lonely, if you don't think so, you are indeed for themselves. but in general, the more i hope from the perceptual angle understand. man is a gregarious animal, is the enemy, friends, is a value. to survive in the world. people will demand
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
收起 更多回答(3)
推荐律师服务: 若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询

为你推荐:

下载百度知道APP,抢鲜体验
使用百度知道APP,立即抢鲜体验。你的手机镜头里或许有别人想知道的答案。
扫描二维码下载
×

类别

我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。

说明

0/200

提交
取消

辅 助

模 式