Question

谁能帮我翻译以下文章，不要用翻译软件，最好是哪位英语高手，谢谢！

2006年10月，一个专为欧盟委员会高层讨论小组撰写的报告草案建议，对来自未采取减排行动国家的能源密集型进口产品征税。然而，这个报告草案并没有得到产业界的广泛欢迎，持保留意见的也不在少数。欧盟贸易委员曼德尔森明确反对这种所谓的京都税，认为采取惩罚性措施不是解决问题的办法，应该倡导和推动WTO下的绿色产品和服务的零关税贸易和国际合作。虽然这种征税措施的合理合法性被质疑，而且其在政治可行性和具体操作上也还存在一定的问题，但是气候变化税似乎来势汹汹。如果可能，这将会成为第一个关于气候变化的贸易壁垒。因此，必须加以关注。

2006年10月，一个专为欧盟委员会高层讨论小组撰写的报告草案建议，对来自未采取减排行动国家的能源密集型进口产品征税。报告被披露后，在欧盟社会各界引起强烈反响。2006年11月13日，在可持续发展部际委员会会议上，法国总理德维尔潘强调“欧洲应该竭尽全力反对环境倾销”，并表示准备与其它欧盟国家协商，自2012年起对来自非《京都议定书》缔约国的进口工业产品征收二氧化碳排放税。
温室气体排放涉及经济的方方面面，能源密集型产业比如钢铁、造纸、炼铝业都是国民经济和出口贸易的重要行业。而一旦欧盟开始征收气候变化税，会对中国出口到欧盟国家的产品产生重要影响。中国企业和产品的能耗高，效率低，按含碳量计算纳税可能要高于美国产品，所以市场价格会随之上升。

虽然气候变化税的合理合法性被质疑，而且其在政治可行性和具体操作上也还存在一定的问题，但是气候变化税似乎来势汹汹。如果可能，这将会成为第一个关于气候变化的贸易壁垒。因此，必须加以关注。

Answer 1

In October, 2006, specially is the report draft which Commission ofEuropean the Union high level discussion group composes suggestedthat, to comes from not to adopt reduces the row of motion country theenergy crowded import product taxation. However, this report draft hasnot certainly obtained the industrial field the widespread welcome,holds has reservations about a matter minority not in. Commission ofEuropean Union Mandelson is clear about opposed this kind of so-calledKyoto tax, thought takes the punitive measure solves the questionmeans, should initiate and impel under WTO the green product and theservice zero customs duty trade and the international cooperation.Although this kind of taxation measure reasonable validity wasquestioned, moreover it also has the certain problem in the politicalfeasibility and the concrete operation, but climatic change tax as ifthreatening. If is possible, this will be able to become first aboutthe climatic change trade barrier. Therefore, must perform to payattention. In October, 2006, specially is the report draft which Commission ofEuropean the Union high level discussion group composes suggestedthat, to comes from not to adopt reduces the row of motion country theenergy crowded import product taxation. After the report is disclosed,from all walks of life causes the strong reprecussion in the EUsociety. On November 13, 2006, in the sustainable developmentdepartment border board meeting, The Republic of France PremierDominique de Villepin emphasized "Europe should do utmost theopposition environment to dump", and expressed the preparation withother EU country consultation, to comes from 2012 the signatory stateimport industry product to levy the carbon dioxide from non- "KyotoProtocol" to discharge the tax. Question supplement that, But under the open economy condition, theeconomical powerful nation and EU main competitor U.S.A does notundertake reduces a row of duty, caused EU to stand in an moredisadvantageous position. Some scholars worried, reduces the row inthe part to lack the adjustment measure under the scene, EU deliversnot only in does not reduce under a row of scene to have to be lessthan, moreover reduces under a row of scene in the whole world also tohave together to be less than. Because of this time U.S A. Deliverscan increase, the market competition causes the low efficiencytechnology and the equipment also can use, thus causes higherdischarging, counterbalances some originally to be allowed to driveurges the expense way shift the endeavor. Therefore, partially reducesthe row only to be able to have the very small effect, isdisadvantageous to the climatic change goal realization,simultaneously weakened the EU enterprise's competitive ability.Moreover the driven condition effect looked that, the new investmentalso is partial to U.S.A, because has the lower investment cost andthe engineering factor, like this originally should eliminate theenergy technology and the equipment instead can obtain theapplication