Question

求翻译 中文翻译成英文 有关于评论漫画的 请不要用翻译器 谢谢 十分重要啊

这几幅漫画十分清晰的呈现了一个关于DNA的有趣的实验。漫画里的每个角色都有各自的特色，让读者容易区分他们，并且给人留下了深刻的印象。特别是主角Charaff， 他的动作和表情都十分丰富有趣。作者将漫画角色的细节把握的很好，比如一些手指的动作，和整个故事非常契合，看得出来作者画画时很仔细。漫画故事叙述的顺序结构也很好，从背景介绍和实验假设到最后整个实验带来的影响，清晰的解释了整个实验步骤，同时每幅漫画的文字解释用词简单，即使是没有学过这个科学的人也能一看就懂了。整幅漫画色彩非常鲜艳，十分吸引读者的眼球，而且非常创新，让人有看下去的欲望。但是有几幅图中的文字解释过多， 应该用更具体的图画来表达观点而不是用文字注解，看漫画应该是一件比较轻松愉快的事情，过多的文字会让读者感觉到自己是读书，而这就违背的漫画的初衷。并且第10幅图和第十一幅图， 图像似乎不能清晰地表达出观点是什么，只能靠阅读文字来来了解作者的观点，文字和漫画没有很好的结合在一起。我认为还可以增加一点关于主角本人生平的介绍，这样可以让读者更容易明白整个实验。

Answer 1

These comic pieces very clearly presented an interesting experiment about DNA. Every cartoon characters have their own characteristics that are easy for readers to make distinguish between and left deep impressions on them. Especially Charaff, the protagonist, his moves and facial expressions are quite rich and interesting. The author well grasped the details of each characters, for example, the move of fingers being very matched to the whole story. This reflects that the author is very careful when drawing.

The order of structure of the storytelling is indeed good. From briefing background and making experimental hypothesis to finally exposing impacts of the whole experiment, it clealy explained all steps necessary to the experiment, meawhile the wording used in describing each piece of the cartoon is of simple ones that allow readers who have ever no any scientific background to get a fast understanding.

Another feature through all these draws is the color used are very bright and attactive, which entices readers to read on.

However, there are drawbacks with the these draws of art. At first, it would be better instead of giving too many text for explaination appeared in several pieces, by using imagized language rather than using text annotations to express specific viewpoints because extra text may let readers feel they are just reading a book rather than a work of comic. Reading comic, for their original demarcation, should be more fanny and pleasant than reading a book.

The second drawback is with the 10th and 11th pieces through which readers cann’t catch up with what viewpoint is presented. Readers have to rely on reading text to understand the thought of the author. What I mean is that the text and figures were not combined so well as expected.

Finally I think it would be helpful to add profiles of the characters in the story which may allow readers to quickly understand the whole experiment.

Answer 2

these pieces of comic show clearly an interesting experiment of DNA.Every cartoon characters have their own characteristics that are easy for readers to make distinguish and leave a deep impressions on them. Especially Charaff, the protagonist, his moves and facial are full of rich interesting .The author grasped in the detail of comic characters.for example some motivition of fingers are matched to the whole story,It can see that the author painted it carefully.The order of structure of the storytelling is indeed good, from the introduction of setting and experimental hypothesis to the whole of experiment ,explaining clearly all the process of experiment ,at the same time the words explaination is sample,even though the man who did not learn this kind of science get easy understanding of these pictures.All the comic pictures are very colourful ,attracting the eye of readers,and innovotion,it has a want look up .but some pictures are explaining too much,it should use illustrated not word note ,it is an relax thing to see comic,too much words feels that it is reading ,it is the purpose of comic.the 10th picture and the 11th picture seems that it did not expression any opinion ,only depending words to know the author's meaning.words and pictures are not well combined .I think we can increase some introduction of the main character and that can make readers knowing all the experiment.

Answer 3

真的没用翻译器，求谅解
These comic pieces very clearly presented an interesting experiment about DNA. Every cartoon characters have their own characteristics that are easy for readers to make distinguish between and left deep impressions on them. Especially Charaff, the protagonist, his moves and facial expressions are quite rich and interesting. The author well grasped the details of each characters, for example, the move of fingers being very matched to the whole story. This reflects that the author is very careful when drawing.

The order of structure of the storytelling is indeed good. From briefing background and making experimental hypothesis to finally exposing impacts of the whole experiment, it clealy explained all steps necessary to the experiment, meawhile the wording used in describing each piece of the cartoon is of simple ones that allow readers who have ever no any scientific background to get a fast understanding.

Another feature through all these draws is the color used are very bright and attactive, which entices readers to read on.

However, there are drawbacks with the these draws of art. At first, it would be better instead of giving too many text for explaination appeared in several pieces, by using imagized language rather than using text annotations to express specific viewpoints because extra text may let readers feel they are just reading a book rather than a work of comic. Reading comic, for their original demarcation, should be more fanny and pleasant than reading
The second drawback is with the 10th and 11th pieces through which readers cann’t catch up with what viewpoint is presented. Readers have to rely on reading text to understand the thought of the author. What I mean is that the text and figures were not combined so well as expected.

Finally I think it would be helpful to add profiles of the characters in the story which may allow readers to quickly understand the whole experiment