Question

100分！英译汉翻译 涉及法律问题 在线等!

The depositions of witnesses shu xiang liang ,li zhen zhang, ping-kai kwok, and hong bin yu were similarly edited .Finally ,the defense stipulated to redactions in the witness zhang dong yu‘ testimony.Baesd on this record, defendants’ general objection to the nature of the deposition testimony must fail .
Although the jury had plenty of deposition testimony to see and hear the witnesses' responses to the examination ,particularly in the caes of the lengthy depositions of witnesses zhen dong yu and hong bin yu,defendants assert that there were technical problems that prevented the jury from observing the demesnor of the witnesses. In the case of witness zhen dong yu,however,thoes technical problem generally consisted of short omitted lines of testimony that were corrected through the reading of that testimony .those issues did not produce a defense reguest for mistrial.
To obtain relief based on these technical issues on appeal ,defendants would have to demonstrate ,as described above in Section A.1,plain error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b).the existence of these issure ,in light of the efforts made to correct them, cannot be deemed plain errdr .Even if these issues constituted obvious error ,defendants cannot show that ,in the context of the lengthy depositions,their substantial rights were affected or that correction through reversal is required to maintain the fairness of judicial proceedings.
As for defendants' claim that they have been deprived of the opportunity for appellate review of the government's failure to introduce the videotaped depositions into evidence, the appropriate procedure would have been to seek expansion of the record in the district court , the government noted that it would be able to provide disks of the full depositions, given technical issues with reproducing the actual redacted protions thatwre played for the jury. There were no objection from the defense at that time .The government now seeks to provide those disks through its concurrently filed motion to expand the record with disks containing the video depositions, from which relevant portions were played for the jury at trial.The recordings are the complete depositions and include the portions redacted as a result of the district court 's rulings on the parties' objections(which are reflected in the filed deposition transcripted ) and the portions that were deleted as described above, so that the defense is able ro evalute what the jury did not see and hear and, if necessary ,seek leave to file supplemental briefing as to the depositions . The augmented record demonstrates that in fact the jury had ample opportunity to hear the lengthy examination of the deposed witnesses and evaluated their credibility.The admission of those videotaped depositions comported with defendants' right to fair trial.

有些单词打错了 希望不要在线翻译或是使用翻译软件。。。 看着根本不通顺

Answer 1

The depositions of witnesses shu xiang liang , li zhen zhang, ping-kai kwok, and hong bin yu were similarly edited .Finally ,the defense stipulated to redactions in the witness zhang dong yu‘ testimony.Based on this record, defendants’ general objection to the nature of the deposition testimony must fail .

由于目击者Shu Xiang Liang、Li Zhen Zhang, ping-kai kwok, 和 Hong Bin Yu的口供是提前编造好的。最终根据抗辩事由相关规定，对于在目击Zhang Dong Yu的证词中进行编造的情况，对被告在作证过程所提出的一般异议表示否决。

Although the jury had plenty of deposition testimony to see and hear the witnesses' responses to the examination ,particularly in the caes of the lengthy depositions of witnesses zhen dong yu and hong bin yu,defendants assert that there were technical problems that prevented the jury from observing the demesnor of the witnesses.

尽管陪审团已经有足够的口供作证经验去辨别证人们在查问中的反应，特别是案件中对于证人Zhen Dong Yu 和Hong Bin Yu冗长的作证，但是被告依然声称存在专业上的原因导致陪审团不能了解到证人的作风问题。

In the case of witness zhen dong yu,however,thoes technical problem generally consisted of short omitted lines of testimony that were corrected through the reading of that testimony .those issues did not produce a defense request for mistrial.

其指陪审团在证人Zhen Dong Yu在案件中的作证过程中，由于简短忽略了在阅读那些证词过程中的发现的有改动现象的证据而造成所谓的“专业原因”，从而产生的那些争议已经不能产生无效审判的抗诉请求。

To obtain relief based on these technical issues on appeal ,defendants would have to demonstrate ,as described above in Section A.1,plain error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b).the existence of these issure ,in light of the efforts made to correct them, cannot be deemed plain errors .

若要通过基于这些专业性问题争议的上诉中获得减轻判决，被告将要求去证明：如上在第A部分第1点中描述那样——根据刑事诉讼程序的联邦规则第52条第(b)节中清楚列明的、正尝试纠正的问题，从中去证明出存在这些争议的事实，而不能单凭主观认为存在这些争议问题。

Even if these issues constituted obvious error ,defendants cannot show that ,in the context of the lengthy depositions,their substantial rights were affected or that correction through reversal is required to maintain the fairness of judicial proceedings.

即使这些争议问题已经构成明显的错误，如果被告不能向法庭证明这个冗长的作证环境中这些证据内容都已经被影响，根据法庭审判中秉承公平原则，继续维持原先通过的撤销的修正决定。

As for defendants' claim that they have been deprived of the opportunity for appellate review of the government's failure to introduce the videotaped depositions into evidence, the appropriate procedure would have been to seek expansion of the record in the district court , the government noted that it would be able to provide disks of the full depositions, given technical issues with reproducing the actual redacted portions that were played for the jury.

至于被告声称的他们已经被剥夺上诉机会去通过录像带记录的作证过程作为证据去指明政府部门的失误的理由，通过适当程序，他们还是可以寻找在区法院内的记录作为证据阐述的确存在争议，相关行政部门的记录是有能力去提供有充足证据的磁带去判断：陪审团在如实地拟写部分内容的效力，对于其复述能力的专业性的问题是否存在。

There were no objection from the defense at that time .The government now seeks to provide those disks through its concurrently filed motion to expand the record with disks containing the video depositions, from which relevant portions were played for the jury at trial.

在那个时候，被告并没有提出任何异议。政府相关部门现今可以通过记录的文档中找到证明的磁带，而且这些磁带包含关于证人作证的录像带，这些记录的部分内容足以证明陪审团在审讯过程中的效力问题。

The recordings are the complete depositions and include the portions redacted as a result of the district court 's rulings on the parties' objections(which are reflected in the filed deposition transcripted ) and the portions that were deleted as described above, so that the defense is able to evalute what the jury did not see and hear and, if necessary ,seek leave to file supplemental briefing as to the depositions .

这些记录都是完整的证人作证过程，同时还包括由于区法院的在当事人的异议的部分制定的规定（在证人证言的副本文件中反映出来的）和如上所述的被删除的部分，因此，被告是有足够能力核定陪审团未能辨别的内容；另外，如有必要，可以找出许可文件的补充纲要作为证据。

The augmented record demonstrates that in fact the jury had ample opportunity to hear the lengthy examination of the deposed witnesses and evaluated their credibility.

这些证据有力证明陪审团事实上是有充足的机会去辨别在冗长的查问过程中证人作证和其中的可信程度。

The admission of those videotaped depositions comported with defendants' right to fair trial.

而获得那些录像带证据的许可权，是被告在公正审判过程的权利范围内同样具备的。

Answer 2

证言证人叔向良，张李真，ping-kai郭，和香宾宇同样编辑。最后，国防部规定节录在证人张东宇的证词。基于这一纪录，被告反对性质的证词必须失败。

虽然陪审团有大量沉积的证词看到和听到的证人的反应的检查，特别是在例冗长的证词证人镇东裕和香宾宇，被告声称，有技术问题，防止陪审员从观察demesnor的证人。在案件的证人镇东裕，然而，这些技术问题通常包括短略行证词是纠正通过阅读证词。这些问题并没有产生一个防御要求为无效审判。

获得救济的基础上这些技术问题的上诉，被告必须证明，如上所述的平原部分，误差在联邦刑事诉讼规则52（乙）。存在这些问题，在光的努力改正，不能被视为平原errdr即使这些问题构成。明显的错误，被告不能证明，在背景的冗长的证词，他们的实体权利受到影响或修正通过逆转是需要保持公平的司法程序。

至于被告声称他们已经被剥夺了机会上诉审查政府未能引进的录像证词为证据，适当的做法是寻求扩张的记录在区域法院，政府指出，它将能够提供磁盘的全部证词，给定的技术问题与再现实际节录部分thatwre打了陪审团。目前还没有异议，当时的国防。现在政府旨在提供这些磁盘通过同时提出议案扩大记录光盘包含视频证词，其中有关部分玩了陪审团的审判。这些录音是完整的沉积和包括部分节录所造成的地区法院的裁决对当事人的反对（这反映在提交沉积转录）和部分被删除，如上所述，使防御能够渗透评估什么陪审团并没有看到和听到的和，如果需要，寻求许可文件作为补充简报的证言。增强的记录表明，事实上，陪审团有充分的机会听到漫长的审查被罢黜的目击者和评价他们的信誉。接纳那些录像证言一致与被告获得公平审判的权利

Answer 3

- - 你给我现金100我都不会翻译

Answer 4

不会英语的就是惨啊~ 我也不会