Question

英语翻译

人工翻译
It cost hundreds of
millions of dollars to make. It has not one, but two, new villains. And it’s
the third film in a hugely successful series. So Spider-Man 3 should be the
best film yet in the series, right? Wrong!

Spider-Man 3 suffers from a complete lack of
imagination. Yes, Spider-Man was a brilliant film and yes, Spider-Man 2 was
every bit as good. But to simply churn out this soulless sequel on the strength
of two box-office hits is an insult to the film-goer. Quite simply, Spider-Man
3 should be ashamed.

The lastest film, based on the Marvel comic character,
sees Spider-Man(Tobey Maguire) fighting two new baddies, Venom and Sandman. I n
the meantime, his girlfriend Mary Jane, who is played by Kirsten Dunst , is
failing in her career as Broadway singer Mary Jane is also having doubts about
her relationship with Spider-Man’s alter ego, Peter Parker, and grows closer to
Parker’s childhood friend Harry Osborn. Osborn, meanwhile, still blames
Spider-Man/Parker for the death of his father and is plotting his revenge. If
this isn’t enough, Spider-Man turns evil after being possessed by an alien
substance, and we are introduced to a black-suited Spider-Man whose only
interest is destruction.

I like the idea of an evil Spider-Man, but the sad
truth is that Maguire just isn’t up to the job. As a good Spider-Man in the
previous films, he was believable. However, he fails to convince us that he can
form gentle as a lamb to truly evil and the film suffers as a result. We simply
can’t believe that he has an evil bone in his body. If anything, Maguire’s
attempt at playing a villain is slightly embarrassing. We can only hope it
doesn’t affect his career.

And while the special effects used to create the
Sandman are impressive, Spider-Man 3 tends to rely on these far too much ,to
the detriment of the acting. In fact, there’ not much even the finest of actors
could have done with such a slow, unimaginative script. Not even a valiant attempt
a by James franco as Osborn and the New Goblin can raise follow. By the end of
the 140 minutes( if you make it that far),you won’t even care what happens to
Peter Parker of Mary Jane.

If you do choose to see this film, don’t forget to
take a pillow with you, and a good book. Superhero? Super boring, more like! I’dlike! I’d rather watch paint dry.

Answer 1

它花费数百美元让人口。它不是一个，而是新的恶魔。及其第三部非常成功的系列。所以蜘蛛侠3应该是最好的电影系列中，对吗？错误的！蜘蛛侠3患有完全缺乏想象力的。是的，蜘蛛侠是一部精彩的电影，是的，蜘蛛侠2 wasevery好一点。但简单地制造出这种没有灵魂的续集的票房实力2是一种侮辱到爱电影的人。很简单，蜘蛛侠3应该羞愧。最新的电影，根据漫画人物，看到蜘蛛侠（托比马奎尔）打两场新的坏人，毒液和睡魔。我的同时，他的女友玛丽简，谁扮演的是克尔斯滕，isfailing在她的职业生涯作为百老汇歌手玛丽简也有怀疑她与蜘蛛侠的改变自我，彼得派克，与增长密切toparker儿时的朋友哈里奥斯本。奥斯本，同时，还blamesspider-man派克为他父亲的死和密谋报复。如果这还不够，蜘蛛侠邪恶后，被aliensubstance，我们介绍了一个到毒液人的onlyinterest是破坏。我喜欢的想法，一个邪恶的蜘蛛侠，但sadtruth是马奎尔不是去工作。作为一个好的蜘蛛侠在以前的电影，他是可信的。然而，他未能说服我们他养成羔羊一样温和真正邪恶和电影受到了影响。我们simplycan不相信他有一个邪恶的他的骨头。如果有的话，maguire'sattempt打小人是稍微尴尬。我们只能希望并不会影响他的事业。虽然使用的特效创建thesandman印象深刻，蜘蛛侠3往往依靠这些太多，对损害的作用。事实上，有不多的最好甚至actorscould做这样一个缓慢的，缺乏想象力的剧本。甚至不是一个勇敢的attempta由詹姆斯·弗兰科奥斯本和新的精灵可以提高后续。结束前140分钟（如果你是那么远），你甚至不会关心会发生什么topeter·简·玛丽。如果你选择看这部电影，不要忘了带你的枕头，一本好书。超级英雄？超级无聊，更喜欢！我想！我宁愿看油漆变干。

Answer 2

它花费数百美元让人口。它不是一个，而是新的恶魔。及其第三部非常成功的系列。所以蜘蛛侠3应该是最好的电影系列中，对吗？错误的！蜘蛛侠3患有完全缺乏想象力的。是的，蜘蛛侠是一部精彩的电影，是的，蜘蛛侠2好一点。但简单地制造出这种没有灵魂的续集的票房实力2是一种侮辱到爱电影的人。很简单，蜘蛛侠3应该羞愧。最新的电影，根据漫画人物，看到蜘蛛（托比马奎尔）打两场新的坏人，毒液和睡蜘蛛侠的改变自我，彼得派克，与增长密切toparker儿时的朋友哈里奥斯本。奥斯本，同时，还blamesspider-man派克为他父亲的死和密谋报复。如果这还不够，蜘蛛侠邪恶后，被aliensubstance，我们介绍了一个到毒液人的onlyinterest是破坏。我喜欢的想法，一个邪恶的蜘蛛侠，但sadtruth是马奎尔不是去工作。作为一个好的蜘蛛侠在以前的电影，他是可信的。然而，他未能说服我们他养成羔羊一样温和真正邪恶和电影受到了影响。我们simplycan不相信他有一个邪恶的他的骨头。如果有的话，maguire'sattempt打小人是稍微尴尬。我们只能希望并不会影响他的事业。虽然使用的特效创建thesandman印象深刻，蜘蛛侠3往往依靠这些太多，对损害的作用。事实上，有不多的最好甚至actorscould做这样一个缓慢的，缺乏想象力的剧本。甚至不是一个勇敢的attempta由詹姆斯·弗兰科奥斯本和新的精灵可以提高后续。结束前140分钟（如果你是那么远），你甚至不会关心会发生什么topeter·简·玛丽。如果你选择看这部电影，不要忘了带你的枕头，一本好书。超级英雄？超级无聊，更喜欢！我想！我宁愿看油漆变感。。。。

Answer 3

像楼主这样 是不会有人愿意答的