Question

英语强人帮我翻译下这段文字了.先谢谢了

There is a different issue relating to incumbent director nominees who fail to win an election. Under the so-called
holdover rule, losing incumbent director nominees continue as directors until replaced, unless such incumbent directors
resign. Thus, implementing majority voting would have little effect without a change to the holdover rule. However,
simply eliminating the holdover rule would result in the problems listed above.
Cumulative voting should be distinguished from plurality and majority voting. While plurality and majority voting
relate to threshold requirements for winning director elections, cumulative voting relates to the number of votes a
shareholder may cast in an election. With cumulative voting each share carries as many votes as there are vacancies to
be filled, and a shareholder may distribute the votes for all such shares among the director nominees in any way desired.
Cumulative voting is generally intended to promote minority shareholder influence, in that a majority shareholder or
shareholder group is not assured of being able to fill every director seat with its own nominees. Certain proponents of
the majority voting standard think there should be a carve-out — allowing plurality voting — for companies that have
cumulative voting.

The cumulative voting system is not a new concept in the United States. Cumulative voting has long been used in
America's corporations as a way of ensuring that minority interests are heard and represented

Answer 1

有一个不同的问题有关的现任署长提名谁不能赢得选举。根据所谓的
缓缴规则，失去现任署长提名继续担任董事职位，直至取代，除非这类现任董事
辞职。因此，实施多数表决将影响甚微，没有变更为缓缴规则。但是，
简单地消除缓缴规则将导致在该问题上面列出。
累积投票应有别于多元性和多数表决。而多元性和多数表决
涉及到的门槛要求，为打赢主任选举，累积投票涉及到的选票数目1
股东可投在选举中。与累积投票，每一股进行很多票由于有空缺
有待填补，和股东可能会分发选票，为所有该等股份之间的主任被提名人以任何方式想要的。
累积投票是普遍旨在促进少数股东的影响力，在这方面的大股东或
股东集团是不放心，能够填补每名董事席位与自己的提名。某些倡议者
大多数投票的标准认为应该有一个雕刻出-让多数投票-公司有
累积投票。

累积投票制是不是一个新概念，在美国。累积投票长期以来一直使用的
美国的公司，以此确保少数股东权益是听取和代表

嘿嘿！电脑翻译的 不太准确