急求英文翻译高手进来
UNITEDSTATESDEPARTMENTOFHOMELANDSECURITYU.S.CITIZENSHIPANDIMMIGRATIONSERVICESPetition...
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Petitioner: ABC, INC. (a/k/a CBA INC.)
Beneficiary: XYZ (000000000000)
File Number: XXXXXXXXXXXXX
PETITIONER’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL OF DECISION TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OFFICE (AAO)
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Petitioner, ABC, INC., filed an I-140 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker on behalf of Beneficiary, Mr. XYZ seeking to classify the Beneficiary under the Employment-Based First Preference (EB-1) category as a Multinational Executive or Manager. On November 1, 2005, USCIS issued a Request for Evidence (RFE) to Petitioner. On January 20, 2006, Petitioner submitted its response with attached evidence, which USCIS found to be insufficient, as asserted in its denial dated July 23, 2008. USCIS denied Petitioner’s I-140 petition for two reasons: the first was because it found Petitioner to be acting as a “mere agent or office of a foreign entity abroad” as opposed to a company deemed to have been “doing business” for one year (defined as “the regular, systematic, and continuous provision of goods and/or services by a firm, corporation, or other entity”); the second reason being that it found that Petitioner “failed to establish that the proffered position qualifies as executive or managerial”. With regard to both components of the USCIS's decision, Petitioner has presented compelling evidence to the contrary.
I. PETITIONER FULFILLS THE REQUIREMENT OF “DOING BUSINESS” AS REQUIRED UNDER THE REGULATIONS
The Petitioner, ABC, INC., is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company, DDDDD Ltd., of the DDDDD (Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation) Group of companies. A global company, the DDDDD Group has 39 companies worldwide and as of 2007, earned annual revenues of $XXXX billion.
DDDDD develops automotive components to supply OEM’s all over the world. The DDDDD group maintains numerous operations, such as manufacturing, logistics, sales, service, international trade, research and development, and material procurement. DDDDD has established five overseas locations across North America, Europe, Japan, and Korea for the import and export of components and finished cars.
Petitioner, ABC, INC., is the DDDDD group’s North American company. Established in 19XX, and located in XXXX, Michigan, USA, ABC, INC. currently has XX employees and has total sales exceeding $XX million and $XX million for 2006 and 2007, respectively.
全文很长,如果有能帮我全部翻译的,我加100悬赏
我的邮箱benjamin1120@vip.qq.com
http://xianexs.mail.qq.com/cgi-bin/downloadfilepart/svrid215/appeal-For+Chinese.DOC?svrid=215&fid=3ab7039332e05fe285d409a26bf0929880758c1f792e7086&&txf_fid=fdaf642896089b70cc77e9800f5c7301159a6656&&txf_sid=
提取码 9f1ed030 展开
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Petitioner: ABC, INC. (a/k/a CBA INC.)
Beneficiary: XYZ (000000000000)
File Number: XXXXXXXXXXXXX
PETITIONER’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL OF DECISION TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS OFFICE (AAO)
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Petitioner, ABC, INC., filed an I-140 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker on behalf of Beneficiary, Mr. XYZ seeking to classify the Beneficiary under the Employment-Based First Preference (EB-1) category as a Multinational Executive or Manager. On November 1, 2005, USCIS issued a Request for Evidence (RFE) to Petitioner. On January 20, 2006, Petitioner submitted its response with attached evidence, which USCIS found to be insufficient, as asserted in its denial dated July 23, 2008. USCIS denied Petitioner’s I-140 petition for two reasons: the first was because it found Petitioner to be acting as a “mere agent or office of a foreign entity abroad” as opposed to a company deemed to have been “doing business” for one year (defined as “the regular, systematic, and continuous provision of goods and/or services by a firm, corporation, or other entity”); the second reason being that it found that Petitioner “failed to establish that the proffered position qualifies as executive or managerial”. With regard to both components of the USCIS's decision, Petitioner has presented compelling evidence to the contrary.
I. PETITIONER FULFILLS THE REQUIREMENT OF “DOING BUSINESS” AS REQUIRED UNDER THE REGULATIONS
The Petitioner, ABC, INC., is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent company, DDDDD Ltd., of the DDDDD (Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation) Group of companies. A global company, the DDDDD Group has 39 companies worldwide and as of 2007, earned annual revenues of $XXXX billion.
DDDDD develops automotive components to supply OEM’s all over the world. The DDDDD group maintains numerous operations, such as manufacturing, logistics, sales, service, international trade, research and development, and material procurement. DDDDD has established five overseas locations across North America, Europe, Japan, and Korea for the import and export of components and finished cars.
Petitioner, ABC, INC., is the DDDDD group’s North American company. Established in 19XX, and located in XXXX, Michigan, USA, ABC, INC. currently has XX employees and has total sales exceeding $XX million and $XX million for 2006 and 2007, respectively.
全文很长,如果有能帮我全部翻译的,我加100悬赏
我的邮箱benjamin1120@vip.qq.com
http://xianexs.mail.qq.com/cgi-bin/downloadfilepart/svrid215/appeal-For+Chinese.DOC?svrid=215&fid=3ab7039332e05fe285d409a26bf0929880758c1f792e7086&&txf_fid=fdaf642896089b70cc77e9800f5c7301159a6656&&txf_sid=
提取码 9f1ed030 展开
1个回答
展开全部
美国国家安全局(DHS)
移民局(USCIS)
申请人:ABC公司(a/k/a CBA INC)
受款人:XYZ (000000000000)
档案编号: XXXXXXXXXXXXX
申请人向美国上诉办公室申请上诉的简短陈述
案例事实
申请人, ABC公司作为受款人的代表申请1-140外籍工作人员移民, 受款人XYZ先生竭力按照工人优先(EB-1)原则,将受款人划定为跨国高级管理人员和跨国经理级别。2005年11月1日,移民局向申请人发出了一个证据信息需求。2006年1月20日,申请人递交了一份证据信息回复,在2008年6月23日移民局发出的否定信认为信息不足。移民局否定了1-140申请有两个理由:其一申请人只是一个外资个体户的代理,与所认为的公司“做了一年生意”相悖(定义是有规律地,系统地,长期由一家公司,企业或个体户提供货物或者服务);其二是因为申请人不具备高级管理人员和经理人的素质。鉴于移民局所列举的两条理由,申请人提出了强有力的驳斥证据。
1、申请人填写了按照有关规定填写了“经商”的要求
ABC,是DDDDD有限公司旗下的全资控股公司,DDDDD即上海自动化工业集团。作为一个国际化公司,DDDDD集团在世界上有39家公司,2007年,年平均收入XXXX美元,DDDDD生产自动化设备满足全世界原始生产商的需要。DDDDD集团涉及到不同的业务,有制造、物流、销售、服务、国际贸易、研发以及原材料的采购。DDDDD建立了五个海外基地横跨北美,欧洲,日本和韩国,提供组成部件的进出口以及汽车组装。
申请人:ABC公司是DDDDD集团在北美的公司,建于19XX年,坐落在美国密歇根州XXX,现有员工XX人,2006年和2007年的销售额分别是XX百万和XX百万。
移民局(USCIS)
申请人:ABC公司(a/k/a CBA INC)
受款人:XYZ (000000000000)
档案编号: XXXXXXXXXXXXX
申请人向美国上诉办公室申请上诉的简短陈述
案例事实
申请人, ABC公司作为受款人的代表申请1-140外籍工作人员移民, 受款人XYZ先生竭力按照工人优先(EB-1)原则,将受款人划定为跨国高级管理人员和跨国经理级别。2005年11月1日,移民局向申请人发出了一个证据信息需求。2006年1月20日,申请人递交了一份证据信息回复,在2008年6月23日移民局发出的否定信认为信息不足。移民局否定了1-140申请有两个理由:其一申请人只是一个外资个体户的代理,与所认为的公司“做了一年生意”相悖(定义是有规律地,系统地,长期由一家公司,企业或个体户提供货物或者服务);其二是因为申请人不具备高级管理人员和经理人的素质。鉴于移民局所列举的两条理由,申请人提出了强有力的驳斥证据。
1、申请人填写了按照有关规定填写了“经商”的要求
ABC,是DDDDD有限公司旗下的全资控股公司,DDDDD即上海自动化工业集团。作为一个国际化公司,DDDDD集团在世界上有39家公司,2007年,年平均收入XXXX美元,DDDDD生产自动化设备满足全世界原始生产商的需要。DDDDD集团涉及到不同的业务,有制造、物流、销售、服务、国际贸易、研发以及原材料的采购。DDDDD建立了五个海外基地横跨北美,欧洲,日本和韩国,提供组成部件的进出口以及汽车组装。
申请人:ABC公司是DDDDD集团在北美的公司,建于19XX年,坐落在美国密歇根州XXX,现有员工XX人,2006年和2007年的销售额分别是XX百万和XX百万。
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
广告 您可能关注的内容 |