Question

用英文翻译下面一段话

通过一个小游戏.作者描述了他是如何因他的孩子们能用新方法看事物而认清创造性思维的本质的。
哪个不是同一类，桔子，西红柿，还是草莓?很显然, 如果这是作业本上的练习，那么没有把西红柿圈出来的孩子全都会被批为答错。凡是没有把问题解读为“哪个不是水果”的孩子都是错的。但是,其他两个答案也未必是错的。答案是桔子，因为另外两种是红色的。答案是草莓，因为另外两种是圆的。桔子，西红柿，草莓都可以是正确答案，为什么要局限孩子的思维，把问题解读为“哪个不是水果”呢？
孩子们会用不同的眼光来看大家都看过的问题，我们应该像孩子所做的那样，去发现有一个以上的正确答案、有一个以上的正确的问题、有一个以上看一堆信息的方法。记住：当你只有一把锤子时，你往往把每个问题都看作钉子。

Answer 1

Through a small game. How because did the author describe him is his children can use the new method to look that the thing clearly recognizes the creative thinking the essence. Which isn't the identical kind, the orange, the tomato, strawberry? Very obviously, if this is on the busy book practice, then has not encircled the tomato the child all can approve to answer wrong. Everything the question explanation hasn't been “which is the fruit” the children are wrong. But, other two answers also not necessarily are wrong. The answer is an orange, because other two kinds are red. The answer is a strawberry, because other two kinds are the circle. The orange, the tomato, the strawberry may be the right key, why can limit child's thought that the question explanation is “which is the fruit”? The children will use the different judgment to come to see everybody has looked the question, we should look like such which the child will do, discovered that will have one above right key, to have one above correct question, to have above one to look at pile of information the method. Remembering: When you when a hammer, you often regard as each question the nail.