Question

翻译为英语 感激不尽 倾尽所有 不要在线翻译 错误忒多 愿意加分加分再加分 全数赠送

最后，文化传统的差异。
1、价值取向不同
美国人重个性，价值取向是以个人为本的个体主义，注重个人利益，崇尚个人发展，实现自我，这是美国文化核心。美国一个学者一针见血地指出：在民主的社会，每个公民习惯地琢磨一个很小的目标，那就是他自己。在家庭中，个人是本位，个体具有最高价值，不依赖他人存在，独立于家庭关系中。所以在美国家庭中，父母倾向于把自身与孩子看成是两个独立的个体，“自我”包括父母自我和子女自我。首先，子女自我价值的实现显然要尊重子女的意愿、兴趣和爱好，因人而异，美国父母比较重个人生活享受，平时决不会为了孩子而放弃去听音乐会、看电影、跳舞或约会。
中国人讲共性，有整体至上的价值观，强调集体利益高于个人利益。中国人认为人的确立方式是在“二人”对立关系中生成的。从古至今，“自我”这个概念总是与他人相伴而生，个人的价值只有在与他人的关系中才得以体现。在中国家庭中，父母丧失自我，也不尊重子女的自我，我国父母丧失自我的表现就是存在严重的“亲子一体感”，父母把孩子视为自身价值的延续，将孩子作为自己生活的全部和人生的希望，具有和孩子不可分割的一体化感觉。这样父母会以自己的意志替代孩子的兴趣，站在成人的角度设计孩子的未来，所以中国父母的期望相对于孩子的能力是过高的。
美国重个性，中国讲共性的价值取向是有其经济背景的。美国在近代资本主义经济结构中，充满活力的商品经济过早排斥了自然经济，独占鳌头近百年。个人在商品经济的条件下相对独立，个人只有提高自我、扩展自我，才能在商品经济竞争中立足和发展，所以养成了重视自我的传统。而中国自然经济延续数千年，中国人习惯性地束缚在土地上，个人失去了独立发展的条件，几十年的计划经济也未能让中国人摆脱依赖性。个人的发展常需要“走关系”，对个人的评价是通过与他人的比较进行的，所以喜欢融入集体，以免被孤立。
2、思维风格不同
美国人是理性主义，美国的家庭教育推崇以理性的基本原则对待家庭成员和家庭事务。美国父母多是把抚养教育孩子的义务，与对社会应尽的义务一样看待，这是超越个人的立场，而不是完全从家庭本身或父母自身的利益来看待家庭教育。既然他们认为抚育子女是义务，也就不图养儿防老，不图回报，自己老了进养老院是一个人应有的归宿（当然，这些中国人视为不道德的做法源于美国的社会保障机制和文化习惯）。
中国人是情意至上，我国的家庭教育以人伦为基础，以情感情理为法则，来处理家庭人际关系。我国父母把孩子看作是自己的私有财产，从个人养老或个人荣誉面子角度考虑子女教育，在无微不至的父母爱怜中隐含着较为浓厚的“投桃报李”的私情。由此说来，就不难理解为什么中国父母“望子成龙”、“盼女成凤”的心情远胜于美国，往往把家庭教育目的功利化。

Answer 1

　　Finally, differences in cultural traditions.
　　1。 different values
　　Americans have personality, value orientation based on individual-based individualism, focusing on personal interests, advocating personal development, self-realization, which is the core of American culture. A U.S. scholar aptly pointed out: In a democratic society, every citizen have the habit of pondering a small goal, that is himself. In the family, the individual is based, the individual with the highest value, do not rely on others to exist, independent of family relationships. So in American families, parents tend to view themselves and the children as two separate individuals, "self", including parents and children of self-self. First of all, children, the realization of self-worth is clear to respect the wishes of children, interests and hobbies, they all had different parents, the United States more emphasis on individual enjoyment of life, usually a child will never give up in order to listen to concerts, watching movies, dancing or appointments .
　　Chinese people talk about similarities, there is an overall supreme values, emphasizing the collective interests above personal interests. Chinese believe that people approach is the establishment of the "two" antagonistic relations generated. From ancient times, "self" concept is always associated with another attendant, personal value only in relationship with others, was able to reflect. In Chinese families, the parents, loss of self, nor the children's self-respect, my parents, loss of self expression is the presence of a severe "parent-child a sense of unity" and parents and their children their own values as a continuation of the child as their own life, full and life, hope, and children with sensory integration indivisible. Such parents will substitute their own children's interests, standing on the perspective of the design of adult children's future, so the expectations of Chinese parents in relation to the child's ability is high.
　　The United States re-personality, the Chinese say there is a common value orientation of their economic background. The United States in the modern capitalist economic structure and dynamic commodity economy premature exclusion of natural economy, champion the past century. Individuals under the conditions of the commodity economy is relatively independent, each individual can do to improve themselves in extended self, can be in the commodity economy based on competition and development, so the importance of self-cultivation tradition. A natural continuation of the Chinese economy for thousands of years, Chinese people habitually tied to the land, to deprive individuals of the conditions of independent development, decades of planned economy failed to let the Chinese people out of dependency. Personal development often need to "take the relationship" to the individual's assessment is carried out by comparison with others, and they tend to integrate into the collective, to avoid being isolated.
　　2, thinking styles in different
　　Americans are rationalism, the U.S. Family Education respected the basic principles of a rational treatment of family members and family matters. The United States are mostly the parents duty to raise and educate their children, and the obligation to society, like look, this is beyond the individual's position, rather than exclusively from the family itself or the parents of their own interests to look at family education. Since they believe that raising children is compulsory, and not have plans to raise children for old age, neither return their old nursing home into a person's fate should be (of course, the Chinese people as unethical practices stem from the U.S. Social Security mechanisms and cultural practices).
　　The Chinese are feelings first, our family education to human relations based, emotional reasoning as a rule, to deal with family relationships. My parents, their children as their own private property, from a personal pension or a personal honor for face-saving point of view about their children's education, caring parent implies more intense sympathy and affection in the "Returning the favor," the affair. Thus speaking, is not difficult to understand why Chinese parents, "Succeed", "hope women into the Phoenix," the mood is far better than in the United States, often utilitarian purpose of family education.

Answer 2

Finally, differences in cultural traditions.
1, different values
Americans have personality, value orientation based on individual-based individualism, focusing on personal interests, advocating personal development, self-realization, which is the core of American culture. A U.S. scholar aptly pointed out: In a democratic society, every citizen have the habit of pondering a small goal, that is himself. In the family, the individual is based, the individual with the highest value, do not rely on others to exist, independent of family relationships. So in American families, parents tend to view themselves and the children as two separate individuals, "self", including parents and children of self-self. First of all, children, the realization of self-worth is clear to respect the wishes of children, interests and hobbies, they all had different parents, the United States more emphasis on individual enjoyment of life, usually a child will never give up in order to listen to concerts, watching movies, dancing or appointments .
Chinese people talk about similarities, there is an overall supreme values, emphasizing the collective interests above personal interests. Chinese believe that people approach is the establishment of the "two" antagonistic relations generated. From ancient times, "self" concept is always associated with another attendant, personal value only in relationship with others, was able to reflect. In Chinese families, the parents, loss of self, nor the children's self-respect, my parents, loss of self expression is the presence of a severe "parent-child a sense of unity" and parents and their children their own values as a continuation of the child as their own life, full and life, hope, and children with sensory integration indivisible. Such parents will substitute their own children's interests, standing on the perspective of the design of adult children's future, so the expectations of Chinese parents in relation to the child's ability is high.
The United States re-personality, the Chinese say there is a common value orientation of their economic background. The United States in the modern capitalist economic structure and dynamic commodity economy premature exclusion of natural economy, champion the past century. Individuals under the conditions of the commodity economy is relatively independent, each individual can do to improve themselves in extended self, can be in the commodity economy based on competition and development, so the importance of self-cultivation tradition. A natural continuation of the Chinese economy for thousands of years, Chinese people habitually tied to the land, to deprive individuals of the conditions of independent development, decades of planned economy failed to let the Chinese people out of dependency. Personal development often need to "take the relationship" to the individual's assessment is carried out by comparison with others, and they tend to integrate into the collective, to avoid being isolated.
2, thinking styles in different
Americans are rationalism, the U.S. Family Education respected the basic principles of a rational treatment of family members and family matters. The United States are mostly the parents duty to raise and educate their children, and the obligation to society, like look, this is beyond the individual's position, rather than exclusively from the family itself or the parents of their own interests to look at family education. Since they believe that raising children is compulsory, and not have plans to raise children for old age, neither return their old nursing home into a person's fate should be (of course, the Chinese people as unethical practices stem from the U.S. Social Security mechanisms and cultural practices).
The Chinese are feelings first, our family education to human relations based, emotional reasoning as a rule, to deal with family relationships. My parents, their children as their own private property, from a personal pension or a personal honor for face-saving point of view about their children's education, caring parent implies more intense sympathy and affection in the "Returning the favor," the affair. Thus speaking, is not difficult to understand why Chinese parents, "Succeed", "hope women into the Phoenix," the mood is far better than in the United States, often utilitarian purpose of family education.