Question

各位英语翻译高手帮帮我啊 ！

众多学者都认为作品中刻画得最成功的人物是南茜，虽然作品以奥立佛为主角，但从社会心理学和精神分析学的角度来看，南茜的角色具有较大的现实意义。南茜是个心理复杂的年轻女性，从小在盗贼集团中长大，没有人知道她的身世，她进入贼窝后也没有遇到任何善良的人，当然最后也遇到了布朗鲁先生和梅里小姐，但那时已经太晚了。最后她惨死在强盗赛克斯的手中，她的命运是悲惨的，就如同现实社会中的孤儿陷入黑社会后的下场一样。南茜看透了盗贼集团中一切丑陋的东西，她厌恶那种奸诈、凶狠、残暴无情，灭绝人性的东西，但她对盗贼集团也有一定的感情，又舍不得离开。她同情奥立佛，像对待自己的亲弟弟般对待他，在危急时刻能够不顾自己的安危而挺身相救他，但他又不得不亲手将奥立佛推上盗贼之路。她羡慕有文化教养，有温暖家庭的女性，但她又因自己的卑微身份而不敢迎上去，不敢奢望这样美满的生活。她的内心是矛盾的，当布朗鲁先生和梅里小姐劝她离开盗贼集团重新做人时，她却拒绝了他们的好意，虽然她向往着这样的生活。南茜的矛盾可以从她的原话中看出：“我不愿意那么干！我不愿意那么干！虽然他是魔鬼，甚至他对我比魔鬼还更加恶毒，但是我不想那么干……另一个理由是，他过得是罪恶生活，我过得也是罪恶的生活，我们在一起许多年过得都是这样的生活，所以我不能出卖他们，何况他们当中有一些本来也可以出卖我，但他们没有出卖，尽管他们也是坏人。”她内心的矛盾冲突是真实的，符合正常人的一般心理。有很多少年女性犯罪者，一旦误入歧途就可能会产生类似南茜的这种矛盾思想：既想脱离犯罪同伙又舍不得离开。南茜虽然对赛克斯所做的一切深恶痛绝，但又离不开他，有人认为南茜的行为不合乎情理，但不管怎样，她的一切所作所为都是真实的。人的心理和思想问题本身就是一个复杂的为问题，不可能用简单的方法就可以解决的。

奥立佛和南茜是这部作品中两个最具有代表性的人物，这是不可否认的。狄更斯在刻画这两个人物时也用了绝妙的手法。然而，在这里我想谈的是另一个形象人物蒙克斯。蒙克斯是奥立佛同父异母的兄弟，但此人却残忍无比，为得到弟弟的财产而不惜毁掉自己的弟弟。我觉得狄更斯在描写蒙克斯的行为时用了巧妙的安排。而蒙克斯这一角色正反映了当时社会上一些贵族子弟的放浪的行为。蒙克斯是聪明人，他知道怎样才能安心地获得弟弟的财产。狄更斯在刻画蒙克斯这一人物形象上可谓是步步为营。首先，蒙克斯是在找班布尔先生时才出现的，作者在前文中并未提到他，以致于我在读到班布尔先生与陌生客人见面这一情节时，直觉就告诉我这一作品的情节将达到另一高潮。神秘人现身，定是有好戏，但我没有想到这个所谓的神秘人竟会是奥立佛的哥哥，而且没想到在后文中他竟扮演了如此重要的角色。狄更斯赋予了蒙克斯“聪明”的头脑，设置了一个无衣无缝的计划，而蒙克斯在施行这一计划时也不吝于跟盗贼首领犹太老头合作，可谓是为达目的不择手段。最后他们的计划还是败露，蒙克斯也是惨败收场。我想，狄更斯把奥立佛的哥哥写成一个贪婪、残暴、无耻的人，一方面能使作品的剧情达到高潮，另一方面也充分展示了现实社火中为达目的而不顾亲情的悲惨现象。作者用这种犀利的笔锋讽刺当时的社火，同时又希望能唤醒那些可悲的人们，唤醒他们的良心与觉悟，唤醒所有人民的觉悟。

Answer 1

Many scholars believe that the most successful works depict the characters are Nancy.Although the works are Oliver is the main character from social psychology and psychoanalysis point of view, Nancy's role has great practical significance.Nancy is a psychological complex of young women, young age group grew up in the thieves, no one knows her life,After she entered the den of thieves did not experience any kind, of course, ultimately met Bulang Lu Miss and Mr. Merry, but then it was too late.Finally, she died a cruel death at the hands of robbers Sykes, her fate is tragic, just like real society after the end of orphans into the same triad. Nancy see through the rogue group of all things ugly, her aversion to the kind of treacherous, vicious, heartless cruelty, inhuman things, but she also has some bandit group feelings, but also reluctant to leave. She has sympathy for Oliver, treat their parents treat him like my brother, in times of crisis to disregard his own safety and to come forward is extended to him, but he had personally pushed to Oliver Road of thieves.She envied culture and education, a warm family woman, but her status because of his humble not to meet her, do not expect such a happy life. Her heart is a contradiction, as Miss Merry and Mr. Bu Langlu advised her to leave again Thieves group life, she refused their offers of help, although she yearned to do with this life. Nancy contradictions can be seen in her own words: "I do not do that! I do not do that!
Although he is the devil and even he told me still more vicious than the devil, but I do not want to not do that ... ... Another reason is that he passes a criminal life and I had a life of sin is that we together have many years flies this is life, so I can not betray them, not to mention some of them may have been betrayed me, but they did not sell out, even though they are bad people. "Her inner conflict is real, consistent with normal general psychological. A lot of young female offenders, if misguided Nancy may have a similar thought such a contradiction:Not only to the crimes they could not bear to leave out. Although Sykes Nancy hated everything, but can not do without him, it was Nancy's behavior that is not justified, but anyway, all she does is true. The psychological and ideological in itself is a complex for the problem, not the simple way we can solve.

Nancy Oliver, and two of this work is the most representative figure, it is undeniable. Dickens depicts two figures in when a wonderful way to use. However, here I want to talk about is another image of the figure Monks. Monks is Oliver's half brother, but this one was extremely cruel, to be his brother's property at his own brother ruined. I think Dickens in describing the behavior of Monks with a clever arrangement.The Monks of this role is reflection of society at that time some aristocratic children of Unconventional behavior. Monks is a wise man, he knew how to ease access to his brother's property. Monks in the portray the character Dickens image can be called at every step. First, the Monks are looking for, Mr. Bumble emerged when the author did not mention his previous article, so that I read Mr. Bumble and the strange guests to meet the circumstances, the instinct told me this works The plot will reach another climax.Mysterious people show up, will have good play, but I do not think this so-called mystery man ruined that Oliver's older brother, but did not think he had later in the play such an important role. Dickens gives Monks "smart" mind, set up a no-clothing seamless program, and Monks in the implementation of this plan is not hesitant to cooperate with the robber chief Jewish old man can be said is that ends justify means. Finally, they plan to or brought to light, Monks also failed miserably.I think Dickens to write Oliver's brother, a greedy, ruthless, shameless people, on the one hand make the story work culminated in the other hand, fully demonstrated the reality of society to achieve the purpose of the fire despite the tragic family phenomenon. A sharp stroke of irony in this society at the time of fire, while those who want to wake up sad people, awaken their conscience and consciousness, awakening the consciousness of all people.

累死老夫啦！

Answer 2

这个应该没人回答，因为太长了，如果实在不行的话，你就找个翻译的网站，一句一句的翻译，呵呵。

Answer 3

太多了哦

Answer 4

Many scholars believe that the most successful works depict the characters are Nancy, while Oliver works to the main character, but from social psychology and psychoanalysis point of view, Nancy's role has great practical significance. Nancy is a psychological complex of young women, young age group grew up in the thieves, no one knows her life, after she entered the den of thieves did not encounter any kind, of course, ultimately met Bulang Lu and Mr. Merry Miss But then it was too late. Finally, she died a cruel death at the hands of robbers Sykes, her fate is tragic, just like real society after the end of orphans into the same triad.
Nancy see through the rogue group of all things ugly, her aversion to the kind of treacherous, vicious, heartless cruelty, inhuman things, but she also has some bandit group feelings, but also reluctant to leave. She has sympathy for Oliver, treat their parents treat him like my brother, in times of crisis to disregard their own safety and to come forward is extended to him, but he had personally pushed to Oliver Road of thieves. She envied culture and education, a warm family woman, but her status because of his humble not to meet her, do not expect such a happy life. Her heart is a contradiction, as Miss Merry and Mr. Bu Langlu advised her to leave the Rogue sets
Mission a new life, she refused their offers of help, although she was this longing for life. Nancy contradictions can be seen in her own words: "I do not do that! I do not do that! Although he is the devil, and even he told me still more vicious than the devil, but I do not want to not do that ... ... other One reason is that he passes a criminal life, I also live in sin flies, flies with us many years of living like this, so I can not sell them, not to mention some of them may have been betrayed me, but They did not sell out, even though they are bad people. "spear her heart
Shield conflict is real, consistent with normal general psychological. There are many young women offenders, if misguided Nancy may have a similar thought such a contradiction: not only the crimes they want to leave the bear to leave. Although Sykes Nancy hated everything, but can not do without him, it was Nancy's behavior that is not justified, but anyway, all she does is true. The psychological and ideological issues is itself a complex for the problem, not the easy way can be resolved.
Nancy Oliver, and two of this work is the most representative figure, it is undeniable. Dickens depicts two figures in when a wonderful way to use. However, here I want to talk about is another image of the figure Monks. Monks is Oliver's half brother, but this one was extremely cruel, to be his brother's property at his own brother ruined. I think Dickens in describing the behavior of Monks with a clever arrangement. The Monks of this role is reflection of society at that time some aristocratic children of Unconventional behavior. Monks is a wise man, he knew how to ease access to his brother's property.
Monks in the portray the character Dickens image can be called at every step. First, the Monks are looking for, Mr. Bumble emerged when the author did not mention his previous article, so that I read Mr. Bumble and the strange guests to meet the circumstances, the instinct told me this works The plot will reach another climax. Mysterious people show up, will have good play, but I do not think this so-called mystery man ruined that Oliver's older brother, but did not think he had later in the play such an important role. Dickens gives Monks "smart" mind, set a plan without clothing seamless, and Monks
In the implementation of this plan is not hesitant to cooperate with the robber chief Jewish old man can be said is that ends justify means. Finally, they plan to or brought to light, Monks also failed miserably. I think Dickens to write Oliver's brother, a greedy, ruthless, shameless people, on the one hand make the story work culminated in the other hand, fully demonstrated the reality of society to achieve the purpose of the fire despite the tragic family phenomenon. A sharp stroke of irony in this society at the time of fire, while those who want to wake up sad people, awaken their conscience and consciousness, awakening the consciousness of all people.