Question

英语翻译成中文，不要用软件随便拉一下，十分感谢，在线等答案。地名之类的名字不用翻译

1. The author unfairly assumes that Dillton’s current prosperity, if any, results from the policies implemented last year. (post hoc, ergo propter hoc) ★★★★★
2. The fact that two manufacturing companies moved to Dillton and employ 300 people is insignificant evidence to show that Dillton are experiencing prosperity. (I.E) ★★★★
3. Without more information about Dillton's economic conditions and employment level both before and after the incentives were established it is impossible to assess whether those incentives had a positive or nega¬tive impact—or any impact at all—on Dillton's overall economy. (adv:disadv/I.I/lack of comparison) ★★★

Answer 1

1. The author unfairly assumes that Dillton’s current prosperity, if any, results from the policies implemented last year. (post hoc, ergo propter hoc) ★★★★★
作者不合理地假设， Dillton现在的繁荣(如果有的话)，是去年政策实施的结果。
2. The fact that two manufacturing companies moved to Dillton and employ 300 people is insignificant evidence to show that Dillton are experiencing prosperity. (I.E) ★★★★
制造企业转移到Dilton并雇佣了300人的事实并不是什么有力的证据能证明Dilton正在经历繁荣。
3. Without more information about Dillton's economic conditions and employment level both before and after the incentives were established it is impossible to assess whether those incentives had a positive or negative impact—or any impact at all—on Dillton's overall economy. (adv:disadv/I.I/lack of comparison) ★★★
没有更多有关采取激励前后Diltion经济状况与就业水平的相关信息，就不可能评估那些激励对Dillton的整体经济起了积极作用还是消极作用——或是根本没有作用。