求高手帮忙翻译成英文,急用,谢谢!!!
实话说,比起成为名人我更想成为富人,这是一个很现实的问题,不是吗?当然,不要把我看得那么肤浅,我有自己的理由。第一,生活需要金钱来维持。我想大家都懂这个道理。而成名不一定...
实话说,比起成为名人我更想成为富人,这是一个很现实的问题,不是吗?当然,不要把我看得那么肤浅,我有自己的理由。
第一, 生活需要金钱来维持。我想大家都懂这个道理。而成名不一定能维持生活,不是吗?更何况,是生前成名还好,要是像某些名人那样生前贫困潦倒,死后才成名的人那不是很惨。当然,我不是有意冒犯他们。
第二, 有钱可以成名,但成名不一定有钱。现在许多富商都是名人,不是吗?他们靠自己雄厚的实力和商业影响而闻名于世。当然,其中不乏富二代。而许多有名的明星他们不一定有钱,要不他们怎么争着嫁大款呢?
第三, 有钱可以快乐,而成名比一定快乐。许多人认为,人一旦富有就会改变,但谁可以肯定,就会变得不快乐。的确,富有可能使人改变,但是,是好是坏关键还是在人。而成名就不一定了。一个人一旦成名,就意味着失去隐私,就会身不由己。当然,这不是绝对,但是,是事实。想想没有隐私,身不由己的生活,你会快乐吗?
因此,比起成为名人,我更想成为有钱人。 展开
第一, 生活需要金钱来维持。我想大家都懂这个道理。而成名不一定能维持生活,不是吗?更何况,是生前成名还好,要是像某些名人那样生前贫困潦倒,死后才成名的人那不是很惨。当然,我不是有意冒犯他们。
第二, 有钱可以成名,但成名不一定有钱。现在许多富商都是名人,不是吗?他们靠自己雄厚的实力和商业影响而闻名于世。当然,其中不乏富二代。而许多有名的明星他们不一定有钱,要不他们怎么争着嫁大款呢?
第三, 有钱可以快乐,而成名比一定快乐。许多人认为,人一旦富有就会改变,但谁可以肯定,就会变得不快乐。的确,富有可能使人改变,但是,是好是坏关键还是在人。而成名就不一定了。一个人一旦成名,就意味着失去隐私,就会身不由己。当然,这不是绝对,但是,是事实。想想没有隐私,身不由己的生活,你会快乐吗?
因此,比起成为名人,我更想成为有钱人。 展开
4个回答
展开全部
Honestly, compared to a celebrity I want to be rich, this is a very real problem, is not it? Of course, do not I see so shallow, I have my own reasons.
First, needs money to maintain. I think everybody understood this truth. The fame may not be able to maintain life, is not it? What's more, is better fame during his lifetime, and if, as some celebrity during his lifetime as impoverished, who became famous only after death that is not miserable. Of course, I did not mean to offend them.
Second, the money to fame, but fame is not necessarily money. Are now many wealthy celebrities, is not it? They rely on their own strength and strong commercial influence throughout the world. Of course, many of them second-generation rich. Many famous stars who do not have money, or how they compete to marry a wealthy it?
Third, the money can be happy, and famous than some happiness. Many people believe that people will change once the rich, but who can be sure, it will become unhappy. Indeed, the rich may give rise to change, however, is the key to good or bad or in person. The fame might not be. Once a person famous, it means loss of privacy, will be beyond our control. Of course, this is not absolute, however, is a fact. Think there is no privacy, living beyond our control, you happy?
So, instead of a celebrity, I want to be rich
First, needs money to maintain. I think everybody understood this truth. The fame may not be able to maintain life, is not it? What's more, is better fame during his lifetime, and if, as some celebrity during his lifetime as impoverished, who became famous only after death that is not miserable. Of course, I did not mean to offend them.
Second, the money to fame, but fame is not necessarily money. Are now many wealthy celebrities, is not it? They rely on their own strength and strong commercial influence throughout the world. Of course, many of them second-generation rich. Many famous stars who do not have money, or how they compete to marry a wealthy it?
Third, the money can be happy, and famous than some happiness. Many people believe that people will change once the rich, but who can be sure, it will become unhappy. Indeed, the rich may give rise to change, however, is the key to good or bad or in person. The fame might not be. Once a person famous, it means loss of privacy, will be beyond our control. Of course, this is not absolute, however, is a fact. Think there is no privacy, living beyond our control, you happy?
So, instead of a celebrity, I want to be rich
追问
能再帮我翻译一下另一篇吗:
首先,我要说明我选此题的理由。我并不是想就成为男人好还是女人好这种事情发一通牢骚。我知道,这个问题自古以来就是一个敏感话题,而且至今没有定论,也不可能有定论。如果就此话题开一个辩论赛,男人一方,女人一方,我想可以争论到天昏地暗,因为我们通常片面地看待这个问题。就我个人观点,我只是想把男人女人作为同属人类的角度去看。
展开全部
To be honest, I am more than became a celebrity to become rich, this is a very practical problem, isn't it? Of course, don't take me to see that shallow, I have a reason. First, the life needs money to maintain. I think everyone understand this truth. Fame can not maintain life, isn't it? Besides, is famous not bad, if before as some celebrities like that poor before, only after death of famous people that's not very badly. Of course, I didn't mean to offend them. Second, money can be famous, but not necessarily famous rich. Now many businessmen are celebrities, isn't it? They depend on their solid strength and commercial influence is famous in the world. Of course, some of them rich the second generation. And many famous star they may not have money, or how they contend for big money to marry? Third, the rich can happy, and happy than certain fame. Many people think that, once people rich will change, but who can be sure of, become less happy. Indeed,
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
To be honest, I am more than became a celebrity to become rich, this is a very practical problem, isn't it? Of course, don't take me to see that shallow, I have a reason.
First, the life needs money to maintain. I think everyone understand this truth. Fame can not maintain life, isn't it? Besides, is famous not bad, if before as some celebrities like that poor before, only after death of famous people that's not very badly. Of course, I didn't mean to offend them.
Second, money can be famous, but not necessarily famous rich. Now many businessmen are celebrities, isn't it? They depend on their solid strength and commercial influence is famous in the world. Of course, some of them rich the second generation. And many famous star they may not have money, or how they contend for big money to marry?
Third, the rich can happy, and happy than certain fame. Many people think that, once people rich will change, but who can be sure of, become less happy. Indeed, rich may make people change, however, is good is bad in one key is. Fame is not necessarily. Once a person is famous, means loss of privacy, he will. Of course, this is not absolute, but, is the fact that. Think about no privacy, choice of life, you will be happy?
So, rather than became a celebrity, I wanted to be a rich man.
行不
First, the life needs money to maintain. I think everyone understand this truth. Fame can not maintain life, isn't it? Besides, is famous not bad, if before as some celebrities like that poor before, only after death of famous people that's not very badly. Of course, I didn't mean to offend them.
Second, money can be famous, but not necessarily famous rich. Now many businessmen are celebrities, isn't it? They depend on their solid strength and commercial influence is famous in the world. Of course, some of them rich the second generation. And many famous star they may not have money, or how they contend for big money to marry?
Third, the rich can happy, and happy than certain fame. Many people think that, once people rich will change, but who can be sure of, become less happy. Indeed, rich may make people change, however, is good is bad in one key is. Fame is not necessarily. Once a person is famous, means loss of privacy, he will. Of course, this is not absolute, but, is the fact that. Think about no privacy, choice of life, you will be happy?
So, rather than became a celebrity, I wanted to be a rich man.
行不
追问
谢谢,但是这是用有道翻译的吧
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
To be honest, I am more than became a celebrity to become rich, this is a very practical problem, isn't it? Of course, don't take me to see that shallow, I have a reason.
First, the life needs money to maintain. I think everyone understand this truth. Fame can not maintain life, isn't it? Besides, is famous not bad, if before as some celebrities like that poor before, only after death of famous people that's not very badly. Of course, I didn't mean to offend them.
Second, money can be famous, but not necessarily famous rich. Now many businessmen are celebrities, isn't it? They depend on their solid strength and commercial influence is famous in the world. Of course, some of them rich the second generation. And many famous star they may not have money, or how they contend for big money to marry?
Third, the rich can happy, and happy than certain fame. Many people think that, once people rich will change, but who can be sure of, become less happy. Indeed, rich may make people change, however, is good is bad in one key is. Fame is not necessarily. Once a person is famous, means loss of privacy, he will. Of course, this is not absolute, but, is the fact that. Think about no privacy, choice of life, you will be happy?
So, rather than became a celebrity, I wanted to be a rich man.
First, the life needs money to maintain. I think everyone understand this truth. Fame can not maintain life, isn't it? Besides, is famous not bad, if before as some celebrities like that poor before, only after death of famous people that's not very badly. Of course, I didn't mean to offend them.
Second, money can be famous, but not necessarily famous rich. Now many businessmen are celebrities, isn't it? They depend on their solid strength and commercial influence is famous in the world. Of course, some of them rich the second generation. And many famous star they may not have money, or how they contend for big money to marry?
Third, the rich can happy, and happy than certain fame. Many people think that, once people rich will change, but who can be sure of, become less happy. Indeed, rich may make people change, however, is good is bad in one key is. Fame is not necessarily. Once a person is famous, means loss of privacy, he will. Of course, this is not absolute, but, is the fact that. Think about no privacy, choice of life, you will be happy?
So, rather than became a celebrity, I wanted to be a rich man.
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询