Question

请达人翻译。

14. Product development
---The factory said they have trails, but no records can be available
--- No documentary evidence was available on site to substantiate for the product claims
---No transit trials
--- No green seal samples were available (the factory did not produce Tesco products yet)
15. Quality management system
---No documented details of deputising cover for personnel with responsibility for legal and safety was available during visit
--- Some records were not accurate, for example, in the risk assessment report, it said the explosion proof light was installed in raw material/finished products warehouse and chemical storage room, but actually not found
16. Environment
---No specific environmental policy was in place, detailing responsibility for meeting local legislative requirements, handling process to minimise overall environmental impact and how this is measured
---The quality management system did not ensure environmental matters are identified and managed
17. Employee training & skills assessment
---The competency of employees did not be reviewed at defined intervals
18. Crisis management
---No detail procedures in place to manage all incidents and potential emerging issues which could affect production safety, legality and quality
---There was no a trained incident management/recall team with named deputies
--No mock recall was undertaken
---No evidence indicated that the recall plan/incident management procedure was reviewed
19. Customer/consumer feedback
---No evidence indicated that the complaint trends was monitored and communicated to the site management and production team
---There was no incident management procedure available to notified Tesco if withdrawal/recall is required
20. Health & safety of employees
---There was no documented health and safety policy available during audit
---The risk assessment required installation of explosion proof lame in chemical storage room/warehouse of finished products and raw material, and recoded as completion. But actually, no explosion proof lamp was found during visit
---No hazard chemical warning label was found when the chemical transferred from its original container (some chemical liquid was filled into the drink bottle without any warning)
---Hazardous manual handling activities were not identified via risk assessment
---There was no system in place to ensure shower heads do not pose a contamination/health risk
---The site providing food service did not complete a documented food safety study, and the hygienic of canteen was not good, flies can be found on the food without covered
---The containers for paint residue were not clearly identified
---Chemical storage areas are not contained (bundled) or have bundled pallets to avoid spillages
21. Ethical trading
---The site was not registered with SEDEX
---Some of the first aid kits were locked
---No showers or water providing in the bath room for employees

Answer 1

14. Product development 产品开发
---The factory said they have trails, but no records can be available工厂说有做实验,但没有可行的记录.
--- No documentary evidence was available on site to substantiate for the product claims现场没有可行的文件证据证明产品申请了专利.
---No transit trials没有运输实验
--- No green seal samples were available (the factory did not produce Tesco products yet)没有现成的有绿色标志的产品(工厂现在仍然没有生产Tesco的产品)
15. Quality management system质量管理系统
---No documented details of deputising cover for personnel with responsibility for legal and safety was available during visit 在检查中没有发现有代表性的详细的文件说明员工的法定职责职能和安全性
--- Some records were not accurate, for example, in the risk assessment report, it said the explosion proof light was installed in raw material/finished products warehouse and chemical storage room, but actually not found有一些记录不准确. 比如,在危险评估报告中,称在原料仓,成品仓,及化学物品储存室都装有防爆灯,但实际上没有.
16. Environment 环境
---No specific environmental policy was in place, detailing responsibility for meeting local legislative requirements, handling process to minimise overall environmental impact and how this is measured没有具体的,合适的环保政策,也没有详细的责任制度以符合当地的环境立法会的要求,也没有可以将总的环境影响降到最低程序的处理程序以及如何评定的程序.
---The quality management system did not ensure environmental matters are identified and managed质量管理系统不能确保环境问题得以清楚地发现和处理
17. Employee training & skills assessment 雇员培训和技能评定
---The competency of employees did not be reviewed at defined intervals雇员的资格能力不能在既定的区域内被评定
18. Crisis management 危险处理能力
---No detail procedures in place to manage all incidents and potential emerging issues which could affect production safety, legality and quality没有详尽的合适的程序去处理所有的突发事件和潜在的危险事件,而这些危险情况会影响产品的安全性,合法性和质量
---There was no a trained incident management/recall team with named deputies没有受过培训的事故处理/回收组,也没有指定的负责人
--No mock recall was undertaken没有举行过回收演习
---No evidence indicated that the recall plan/incident management procedure was reviewed没有证据表明已复核了回收计划/事故处理程序
19. Customer/consumer feedback 顾客/顾客反馈
---No evidence indicated that the complaint trends was monitored and communicated to the site management and production team没有证据表明对顾客的投诉进行了跟踪调查,也不能表明向现场的管理团队和生产团队传达了这一投诉.
---There was no incident management procedure available to notified Tesco if withdrawal/recall is required没有事故处理程序能有效的通知Tesco是否有必要撤消/回收
20. Health & safety of employees 雇员的健康和安全
---There was no documented health and safety policy available during audit在审核中没有发现有效的关于健康和安全条例的文件
---The risk assessment required installation of explosion proof lame in chemical storage room/warehouse of finished products and raw material, and recoded as completion. But actually, no explosion proof lamp was found during visit危险评估中要求在化学品储存室/成品仓及原料仓都装有防爆灯,并且记录中也称已装有,但实际上在检查中并未发现有
---No hazard chemical warning label was found when the chemical transferred from its original container (some chemical liquid was filled into the drink bottle without any warning)当化学品从原始的容器中拿出后并没有贴上危险化学品警告标签(一些化学液体被装进饮料瓶,而且没有任何警告标签)
---Hazardous manual handling activities were not identified via risk assessment经过危险评定, 不能确定危险手册处理行动
---There was no system in place to ensure shower heads do not pose a contamination/health risk没有合适的系统可以保证喷头不会产生污染物或不会对健康造成危险
---The site providing food service did not complete a documented food safety study, and the hygienic of canteen was not good, flies can be found on the food without covered现场的食物供应服务没有完整的食品安全研究报告文件,而且餐厅的卫生状态也不好,在没有盖上盖子的食品中发现有苍蝇
---The containers for paint residue were not clearly identified不能清楚的辨认出盛放油漆余渣的容器
---Chemical storage areas are not contained (bundled) or have bundled pallets to avoid spillages为防止泄漏,化学品储藏区不应有踏板
21. Ethical trading 诚信经营
---The site was not registered with SEDEX现场没有注册SEDEX
---Some of the first aid kits were locked有些急救设备被锁住
---No showers or water providing in the bath room for employees在雇员的冲凉房里没有发洒或水

Answer 2

14。产品开发

工厂- - -说他们有创新,但没有记录能是可得到的

- - - - - -没有书面证据证实可用现场对产品的要求

试验- - - - -不用了交通

- - - - - -没有绿色密封样品是可行的(工厂没有产生乐购产品尚未确定)

15。质量管理体系

记录的细节- - - - -不用替人员代表负责的法律和安全访问期间可用

- - - - - -一些记录并不准确,例如,在风险评估报告,据说防爆灯被安装于原材料/成品仓库和化学的存储空间,但事实上,却未曾找到

16岁。环境

- - - - -不用了特定的环境政策到位、责任地方立法会议详细要求,处理过程的整体环境的影响降到最低,这种测量

- - - - - - - - - - - -不保证质量管理体系的确定和环境方面的管理

17岁。员工培训和技能评估

- - - - - - - - - - - -资格审查员工并没有按规定的时间间隔

18岁。危机管理

细节的地方- - - - -不用程序来管理这些事件和潜在的新出现的问题可能影响生产安全、合法和质量

- - - - - - - -没有一个训练有素的事件管理团队,代表/追回命名

回忆——没有嘲笑绝迹

证据表明,- - - - -不用召回计划/事件管理程序等研究进展进行了综述

19岁。顾客/消费者反馈

证据表明,- - - - -不用趋势进行监测及投诉告知现场的管理和生产队伍

- - - - - - - -没有事件管理程序可以记得通知如果撤回乐购是必要的

20。健康及安全的雇员

没有记录- - - - - - - -可以在安全与健康政策审核

风险评估- - - - - - - - - - - -需要安装防爆跛化学品储存室/仓库的成品和原材料,局部为完成。但实际上,没有防爆灯参观时被发现

- - - - -不用化学警告标签被发现危险化学转让时从原来的容器(一些化工液体的瓶子满了没有任何预警喝)

-Hazardous手工处理——活动并不是通过风险评估确定

- - - - - - - -没有系统以保证莲蓬头不构成污染的健康风险

网站提供食物服务- - -没有完成一个记录食品安全研究,卫生的餐厅并不理想,飞上可以找到食物没有覆盖

油漆渣- - -是容器还没有明确

储存区域——目的不含(捆绑)或避免捆绑托盘溢出

21。伦理交易

- - - - - - - - - - - -没有注册网站主要

————的急救工具都是锁着的

- - - - -不用提供淋浴或水浴室为员工

Answer 3

14。 产品开发
工厂- - -说他们有创新,但没有记录能是可得到的
- - - - - -没有书面证据证实可用现场对产品的要求
试验- - - - -不用了交通
- - - - - -没有绿色密封样品是可行的(工厂没有产生乐购产品尚未确定)
15。 质量管理体系
记录的细节- - - - -不用替人员代表负责的法律和安全访问期间可用
- - - - - -一些记录并不准确,例如,在风险评估报告,据说防爆灯被安装于原材料/成品仓库和化学的存储空间,但事实上,却未曾找到
16岁。环境
- - - - -不用了特定的环境政策到位、责任地方立法会议详细要求,处理过程的整体环境的影响降到最低,这种测量
- - - - - - - - - - - -不保证质量管理体系的确定和环境方面的管理
17岁。员工培训和技能评估
- - - - - - - - - - - -资格审查员工并没有按规定的时间间隔
18岁。危机管理
细节的地方- - - - -不用程序来管理这些事件和潜在的新出现的问题可能影响生产安全、合法和质量
- - - - - - - -没有一个训练有素的事件管理团队,代表/追回命名
回忆——没有嘲笑绝迹
证据表明,- - - - -不用召回计划/事件管理程序等研究进展进行了综述
19岁。顾客/消费者反馈
证据表明,- - - - -不用趋势进行监测及投诉告知现场的管理和生产队伍
- - - - - - - -没有事件管理程序可以记得通知如果撤回乐购是必要的
20。 健康及安全的雇员
没有记录- - - - - - - -可以在安全与健康政策审核
风险评估- - - - - - - - - - - -需要安装防爆跛化学品储存室/仓库的成品和原材料,并recode