请教SAT语法问题
1.Iborrowabookfromthesonofmyteacherwhoisaniceperson.Iborrowabookfromthesonofmyteacher...
1.I borrow a book from the son of my teacher who is a nice person.
I borrow a book from the son of my teacher ,who is a nice person.
两个句子中的who指代的都是“my teacher”吗?
2.predict的从句可以用将来时吗?
如:she predicts ....will....
3.
在语法课堂上,老师说,并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语
比如:During the labor, potatoes were empited across the highway, and "they" thereby blocked all traffic.
引号里面的主语“they”就指代上句中的主语“potatoes”。
It is hard for some young people to believe that women were at one time not admitted to some "colleges, but they have since become coeducational."
引号部分错误,因为按照“主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语”,“they”指代的是“women”,但“coeducational”修饰的是“colleges"。
我的问题是 "colleges, but they have since become coeducational."没有指代不明的问题,是吗?(因为我们已经可以根据“主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语”知道“they”指代的是“women”而不是“colleges”)
我的理解对吗? 展开
I borrow a book from the son of my teacher ,who is a nice person.
两个句子中的who指代的都是“my teacher”吗?
2.predict的从句可以用将来时吗?
如:she predicts ....will....
3.
在语法课堂上,老师说,并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语
比如:During the labor, potatoes were empited across the highway, and "they" thereby blocked all traffic.
引号里面的主语“they”就指代上句中的主语“potatoes”。
It is hard for some young people to believe that women were at one time not admitted to some "colleges, but they have since become coeducational."
引号部分错误,因为按照“主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语”,“they”指代的是“women”,但“coeducational”修饰的是“colleges"。
我的问题是 "colleges, but they have since become coeducational."没有指代不明的问题,是吗?(因为我们已经可以根据“主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语”知道“they”指代的是“women”而不是“colleges”)
我的理解对吗? 展开
展开全部
I borrow a book from the son of my teacher who is a nice person.指的是teacher,离谁近修饰谁
I borrow a book from the son of my teacher ,who is a nice person.这个修饰宾语,即son
主语指代主语是这样的:
如果两个分句之间没有标点,只要能找到符合逻辑的指代对象就可以,但如果是 SVO, pron+VO就必须主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语。这是比较严格的书面语,估计只有考sat的才知道。。。所以楼上的=-=
楼主的理解应该没问题。。
I borrow a book from the son of my teacher ,who is a nice person.这个修饰宾语,即son
主语指代主语是这样的:
如果两个分句之间没有标点,只要能找到符合逻辑的指代对象就可以,但如果是 SVO, pron+VO就必须主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语。这是比较严格的书面语,估计只有考sat的才知道。。。所以楼上的=-=
楼主的理解应该没问题。。
展开全部
1. I borrow a book from the son of my teacher who is a nice person.
I borrow a book from the son of my teacher ,who is a nice person.
两个句子中的who指代的既可能是 "the son" ,也可能是 "my teacher”。 属指代不明。
2. predict 的宾语从句可以用将来时。
3. “并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语"
--------此说毫无依据!
是语义和语用在决定,绝不存在"在并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语"之说。
在During the labor, potatoes were empited across the highway, and they thereby blocked all traffic. 中,主语 they 指代上句中的主语 potatoes。they 只能指 potatoes,与各自都做了主语毫无关系。除了potatoes 这个复数名词在下句中能,也该用复数的 they 指代外,还有任何其他复数的名词吗? 这与都做了主语有何关系?没有!
It is hard for some young people to believe that women were at one time not admitted to some “colleges, but they have since become coeducational.”
仅就引号部分而言,无错!(无“在并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语”之说。) they 指代的是 colleges,语义告诉我们,只有 colleges (复数) 才能 co-educational。即:..., but they (the colleges) since have become co-educational. 岂能说 the women have since become co-educational?
"colleges, but they have since become coeducational." 没有指代不明的问题!(they 指代的不是 women, 而是 colleges)
I like the book, but it is out of stock in that bookstore.
这是个并列句吧!the book 是宾语,it 是主语。哪里存在"在并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语"之说?
I have put the books back on the shelf, and by the way they are too difficult for beginners.
这是个并列句吧!the books 作宾语,they 作主语。哪里有"在并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语"之说?
I borrow a book from the son of my teacher ,who is a nice person.
两个句子中的who指代的既可能是 "the son" ,也可能是 "my teacher”。 属指代不明。
2. predict 的宾语从句可以用将来时。
3. “并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语"
--------此说毫无依据!
是语义和语用在决定,绝不存在"在并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语"之说。
在During the labor, potatoes were empited across the highway, and they thereby blocked all traffic. 中,主语 they 指代上句中的主语 potatoes。they 只能指 potatoes,与各自都做了主语毫无关系。除了potatoes 这个复数名词在下句中能,也该用复数的 they 指代外,还有任何其他复数的名词吗? 这与都做了主语有何关系?没有!
It is hard for some young people to believe that women were at one time not admitted to some “colleges, but they have since become coeducational.”
仅就引号部分而言,无错!(无“在并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语”之说。) they 指代的是 colleges,语义告诉我们,只有 colleges (复数) 才能 co-educational。即:..., but they (the colleges) since have become co-educational. 岂能说 the women have since become co-educational?
"colleges, but they have since become coeducational." 没有指代不明的问题!(they 指代的不是 women, 而是 colleges)
I like the book, but it is out of stock in that bookstore.
这是个并列句吧!the book 是宾语,it 是主语。哪里存在"在并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语"之说?
I have put the books back on the shelf, and by the way they are too difficult for beginners.
这是个并列句吧!the books 作宾语,they 作主语。哪里有"在并列句中,主语指代主语,宾语指代宾语"之说?
更多追问追答
追问
第1题,我在SAT语法笔记看到过,并不是指代不明,而是有指代不同的区别,所以才问分别指什么
第3题,引号部分有错,是新东方老师讲解的,因为“they”指代“women”。
追答
1. I borrow a book from the son of my teacher who is a nice person.
I borrow a book from the son of my teacher ,who is a nice person.
两个句子中的who指代的既可能是 "the son" ,也可能是 "my teacher”。 属指代不明。
不必讨论。换了我,我会只用第二句,第一句有不礼貌的 suggestion.
"第3题,引号部分有错,是新东方老师讲解的,因为“they”指代“women”。"
------新东方不代表正确!!!最最最基本的语义逻辑告诉我们 "they” 不可能指 women。
------为什么拿新东方当gauge呢?君不见他们有很多书错误百出? 君不见那里的很多老师就是一张嘴? 只会让自己的讲话富有煽动性?他们有很多人水平急需提高的!
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询