英语翻译,急求急求
FirstOptionThosewhoadvocatedinvasionirrespectiveofalliedorinternationalsuppOrtusedsev...
First Option
Those who advocated invasion irrespective of allied or international suppOrt used
several arguments. The primary argument was that Saddam Hussein possessed
weapons banned by UN Security Council resolurions, which might be transferred
to terrorist groups who could use them or threaten to use them against the
United States and European states. President Bush said that we must act before
"the smoking gun" is "a mushroom cloud" (Bush 2002). !t is thus imperative to
remove Saddam Hussein from power, because (Rl) Saddam Hussein supports
terrorists who are hostile to the United States by providing them with funding
and weaponry. Second, this is especially important, because (R2) Saddam
Hussein has an extensive arsenal ofchemical and biological weapons and the
nuclear weapons program is near completion.
A third rarionale was that replacing Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist government
with a democracy would lead to a more peaceful relationship between the West
and Iraq. Proponents offered a "democratic domino theory." according to which
a democtacy in !taq would show othet Arab states that they too deserve the benefits
of democracy, which would lead to the overthrow of other autocracies in the
tegion. (R3) A democracy would lead to a more peaceful relationship
between the West and Iraq.
A further rarionale was that Saddam Hussein must be removed from power
regardless ofwhat the mher UN Security Council members decided because he is
a dictator who cannot be deterred; it is impossible to reason or negotiate with
him. He will continue to attack other states either through state invasions or
through his support of nonstate actors, especially as terrorist groups. The only
effective way to deal wirh dictators is to remove them by means of military force.
(R4) Saddam Hussein is a dictator who cannot be deterred from aggressive
behavior and must be removed.
Finally, some preferred a non-UN operation in order to avoid problems with
rhe chain of command weakness under the UN that proved to be dangerous to
trOOps on the ground in Bosnia. Commanders and UN officials who do not have
a sound undersranding of the specific dangers of combat would have to give
orders to use force in particular situations, and some would be reluctant to do so.
which would endanger soldiers' lives and the success ofsome of their operations.
Thus, (RS) there is a chain ofcommand wealrness under the UN. There were
many other rationales offered ltut they were not advanced as primary or presented
as able to justify a u.S.-fed invasion by themselves. 展开
Those who advocated invasion irrespective of allied or international suppOrt used
several arguments. The primary argument was that Saddam Hussein possessed
weapons banned by UN Security Council resolurions, which might be transferred
to terrorist groups who could use them or threaten to use them against the
United States and European states. President Bush said that we must act before
"the smoking gun" is "a mushroom cloud" (Bush 2002). !t is thus imperative to
remove Saddam Hussein from power, because (Rl) Saddam Hussein supports
terrorists who are hostile to the United States by providing them with funding
and weaponry. Second, this is especially important, because (R2) Saddam
Hussein has an extensive arsenal ofchemical and biological weapons and the
nuclear weapons program is near completion.
A third rarionale was that replacing Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist government
with a democracy would lead to a more peaceful relationship between the West
and Iraq. Proponents offered a "democratic domino theory." according to which
a democtacy in !taq would show othet Arab states that they too deserve the benefits
of democracy, which would lead to the overthrow of other autocracies in the
tegion. (R3) A democracy would lead to a more peaceful relationship
between the West and Iraq.
A further rarionale was that Saddam Hussein must be removed from power
regardless ofwhat the mher UN Security Council members decided because he is
a dictator who cannot be deterred; it is impossible to reason or negotiate with
him. He will continue to attack other states either through state invasions or
through his support of nonstate actors, especially as terrorist groups. The only
effective way to deal wirh dictators is to remove them by means of military force.
(R4) Saddam Hussein is a dictator who cannot be deterred from aggressive
behavior and must be removed.
Finally, some preferred a non-UN operation in order to avoid problems with
rhe chain of command weakness under the UN that proved to be dangerous to
trOOps on the ground in Bosnia. Commanders and UN officials who do not have
a sound undersranding of the specific dangers of combat would have to give
orders to use force in particular situations, and some would be reluctant to do so.
which would endanger soldiers' lives and the success ofsome of their operations.
Thus, (RS) there is a chain ofcommand wealrness under the UN. There were
many other rationales offered ltut they were not advanced as primary or presented
as able to justify a u.S.-fed invasion by themselves. 展开
2个回答
展开全部
美国人不雅的餐桌礼仪。然而,我们需要一些文明的餐桌礼仪!合乎礼节的餐桌礼仪的规则太多,需要无尽的时间,列出每个项目。因此,让我们进入正确的食物。
这是一个快捷方式:在你的盘子中间。刀和勺子在你的右手,叉和纸巾在你的左边。液体(译者注:应该是指有喝的饮料)(如水)是你的权利,固体(如面包板)在你的左边。您知道您的项目的位置。现在是时间去了解如何恰当的使用。拿起你的餐布放在膝盖上,当你坐下来,它不应该是放在桌子上。距离最远的边缘叉开胃菜使用。当了一个程序的第二个客场叉菜。等。汤匙和刀的使用,就是这个原因。
这是一个快捷方式:在你的盘子中间。刀和勺子在你的右手,叉和纸巾在你的左边。液体(译者注:应该是指有喝的饮料)(如水)是你的权利,固体(如面包板)在你的左边。您知道您的项目的位置。现在是时间去了解如何恰当的使用。拿起你的餐布放在膝盖上,当你坐下来,它不应该是放在桌子上。距离最远的边缘叉开胃菜使用。当了一个程序的第二个客场叉菜。等。汤匙和刀的使用,就是这个原因。
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询