Question

求大神翻译 求语句通顺 不要复制在线翻译上的结果给我

Mixing skills and methodologies.
Having in mind the complete framework proposed by Smith [1] one question arises: are all the methodologies necessary ? At which level of knowledge? Of course com panies can’t afford to have people in their development department completely trained in all the methodologies, so it’s importantto design a development process in which we can identify a well-specified path, and the methodologies useful at each step.
The observed approach in companies is to specialize people in just one methodology. So, at the end,they have some experts with a deeply knowledge in their specific field, but, very often without any structure to connect them and to make them work together.
One drawback of this approach is that the expert is focused on maximizing the outcomes from applying its methodology forgetting the potential of using other tools. The second drawback is that experts tend to develop specific communication protocols among their community, so the communication between different methodologies can be very difficult if not impossible.
For companies aiming to develop a structured way of working using synergy of methodologies, is crucial to plan with accuracy people education on different methodologies, and to focus on mixing experts in team building.

Answer 1

技巧与方法的并用
在考虑史密斯所提出的全盘框架时，突显出一个疑问：所有这些许多套方法都是必要的？在哪个知识水平？当然，要让发展部门的人员接受所有方法的充分训练，企业是负担不起的；因此，设计一套能够确认一条清晰的指定路径以及规定每个阶段的最佳方法的工序，尤为重要。
据观察，企业所采取的方式是把其人员针对一套方法进行专业训练。最终，企业拥有许多在个别特定领域的专家，但通常都是缺乏一套汇合他们一起工作的体系。
这种方式的缺点是专家将重点放在最大化他们自己方法的结果而忽略了使用其他工具的潜在好处。第二个缺点是这些专家会倾向于在自己专业的圈内建立特定的沟通方式，导致与其他方法领域的交流非常困难，甚至是不可能的。
对于那些立志利用多种方法的协同效应，想建立一个结构化工作方式的企业，关键是要准确规划使人员接受不同方法的教育，并将重点放在并合各领域专家在一起建立一个团队。

【英语牛人团】