Question

帮忙写个Critique，只要一段话，列点也可以，谢谢，在线等。真心求解，急急急，追加悬赏，

实在不行了，看得一点头绪都没有，马上就要Due了。求英语好的帮忙解答下，有加分。要原文加我QQ或邮箱308363553@qq.com 谢谢。

我不知道老师的原意是要做什么，这里是今天大致将的内容。是要分析这里面哪些句子占了以下几点嘛？
clearly defined terms, fair use of information, logical argumetation, emotionally loaded terms, faulty cause and effect, either/or reasoning, hasty generalization, false analogy, begging the question non sequitur, oversimplification.
英语团的帮个忙!!!!

Answer 1

clearly defined terms：“the sexsual indifferentiation of roles”Thus speak the Expert.

fair use of information：The front page picture of New York Post means seeing is believing.

emotional loaded terms：The last sentence of paragraph one shows a santimonious saint standing on a high altar expressing sympathy for the suffering of human and hatred for bureaucracy .

faulty cause and effect:The last sentence of paragraph two，no wonder we are a country of low birth rate and a high divoce rate.The conclusion deducted from the blurring of the sexsual indifferentiation of roles is very unreliable.

either/or reasoning：The first and second sentences of paragraph two shows the picture is not of women's equality but nuttiness.The author can only have types of women:either equal or nut,and nothing more.

hasty generalization：The same as the last sentence of paragraph two，with no more reasoning than blurring of the sexsual indifferentiation of roles, the author arbitrarily came to the complaining that we are a country of low birth rate and a high divoce rate.

oversimplicification：The whole passage is full of emotional judgement and bad reasoning and a disgust toward the blurring of the sexsual indifferentiation of roles.