Question

水能帮我把这段翻译成中文

In recent years, more and more countries have laid down the law to prohibit smoking in some public places such as restaurants, netbar. Some business also say that no one can smoke cigarettes in workplaces. Whether the ban on smoking would be effective comes into a problem.

In my opinion, putting the non-smoking ban into practice is one effective way to achieve the reduction of harms to people and society which result from smoking.

No one own total freedom and everyone needs restrictions. It is the case for the smokers in the smoke-free places. The ban could force the smokers to abide by the rules and to give up the passive smoking in public. As a result, the smoke-free buildings and public places truly protect nonsmokers from the dangers of breathing in other people’s tobacco smoke, which also could encourage smokers to reduce smoking or quit altogether.

In fact, accrding to many reports,the ratio of the heart attacks related closely to the smoking in some areas dropped greatly after the a ban was enacted and the researchers atttibute the dramatic drop mainly to the ban. This fact also proves the effectiveness of the non-smoking ban.

In recent years, more and more countries have laid down the law to prohibit smoking in some public places such as restaurants, netbar. Some business also say that no one can smoke cigarettes in workplaces. Whether the ban on smoking would be effective comes into a problem.

In my opinion, putting the non-smoking ban into practice is one effective way to achieve the reduction of harms to people and society which result from smoking.

No one own total freedom and everyone needs restrictions. It is the case for the smokers in the smoke-free places. The ban could force the smokers to abide by the rules and to give up the passive smoking in public. As a result, the smoke-free buildings and public places truly protect nonsmokers from the dangers of breathing in other people’s tobacco smoke, which also could encourage smokers to reduce smoking or quit altogether.

In fact, accrding to many reports,the ratio of the heart attacks related closely to the smoking in some areas dropped greatly after the a ban was enacted and the researchers atttibute the dramatic drop mainly to the ban. This fact also proves the effectiveness of the non-smoking ban.

Therefore, i advocate the non-smoking ban for its effectiveness on the reduction of smoke pollution and dieases risks. I hope both smokers and non-smokers would be able to share public places peacefully and enjoy themselves fully outside.

Answer 1

In recent years, more and more countries have laid down the law to prohibit smoking in some public places such as restaurants, netbar. Some business also say that no one can smoke cigarettes in workplaces. Whether the ban on smoking would be effective comes into a problem.
近年来，越来越多的国家已经通过法律手段来禁止在一些公共场所的吸烟行为，比如餐厅和网吧。有些商业机构也要求工作场所不能吸烟。但是禁烟令能否有效成为了当前的一个问题。

In my opinion, putting the non-smoking ban into practice is one effective way to achieve the reduction of harms to people and society which result from smoking.
我个人认为，真正贯彻实施禁烟令是减少烟对人民和社会毒害的一种行之有效措施。

No one own total freedom and everyone needs restrictions. It is the case for the smokers in the smoke-free places. The ban could force the smokers to abide by the rules and to give up the passive smoking in public.
没有人能拥有全部的自由，每个人都需要一定的限制，这就像吸民身处无烟区一样，这种禁止能有效促使烟民遵守规定，从而消除了他人在公共场所的被动吸烟。

As a result, the smoke-free buildings and public places truly protect nonsmokers from the dangers of breathing in other people’s tobacco smoke, which also could encourage smokers to reduce smoking or quit altogether.
这样一来，作为无烟区的建筑物和公共场所就真正保护了不抽烟者，使他们远离了吸入二手烟的危险，而且这也可以鼓励烟民减少抽烟甚至戒烟。

In fact, accrding to many reports,the ratio of the heart attacks related closely to the smoking in some areas dropped greatly after the a ban was enacted and the researchers atttibute the dramatic drop mainly to the ban. This fact also proves the effectiveness of the non-smoking ban.
真实上，根据我的报告显示，原来的一些心脏病患病几率与吸烟高度紧密相关的地区，在禁烟令实施之后患病几率大幅下降。研究人员认为，这些地区心脏病患病几率的艰巨性下降主要是由于禁烟令的贯彻，这也体现了禁烟令的有效性。

In recent years, more and more countries have laid down the law to prohibit smoking in some public places such as restaurants, netbar. Some business also say that no one can smoke cigarettes in workplaces. Whether the ban on smoking would be effective comes into a problem.
“同上”

In my opinion, putting the non-smoking ban into practice is one effective way to achieve the reduction of harms to people and society which result from smoking.
“同上”

No one own total freedom and everyone needs restrictions. It is the case for the smokers in the smoke-free places. The ban could force the smokers to abide by the rules and to give up the passive smoking in public. As a result, the smoke-free buildings and public places truly protect nonsmokers from the dangers of breathing in other people’s tobacco smoke, which also could encourage smokers to reduce smoking or quit altogether.
“同上”

In fact, accrding to many reports,the ratio of the heart attacks related closely to the smoking in some areas dropped greatly after the a ban was enacted and the researchers atttibute the dramatic drop mainly to the ban. This fact also proves the effectiveness of the non-smoking ban.
“同上”

Therefore, i advocate the non-smoking ban for its effectiveness on the reduction of smoke pollution and dieases risks. I hope both smokers and non-smokers would be able to share public places peacefully and enjoy themselves fully outside.
因此，我非常提倡禁烟令的实施，因为它的有效实施减少了与烟相关的污染和疾病风险。我也希望，烟民与非烟民能和谐地分享公共场所，使所有人都在公共场所自得其乐！

Answer 2

在近年来，越来越多的国家制定了法律禁止在一些公共场所吸烟如餐厅，网吧。一些商界行规也规定，没有人可以在工作场所吸烟。是否禁止吸烟的法令将有效成为了一个问题。

我认为，把禁烟法付诸实践是一个有效的途径，能减少吸烟对人民和社会所造成的危害。

没有人是完全自由的，每个人都需要一定的限制。这是吸烟者在无烟场所应遵守的。这项禁令能迫使吸烟者遵守规则，以至于不能在公众间散播二手烟。因此，禁烟的建筑物和公共场所里非吸烟者被切实的保护下来，他们避免了呼吸进其他人的烟草烟雾的危险，这也可以鼓励吸烟者减少吸烟或集体戒烟。

事实上，根据许多报告，心脏病发作的比率和一些在禁令实施后吸烟量减少的区域密切相关，研究员表示这个比率的下降主要归功于禁令。这一项实施也证明了禁烟令的有效性。

因此，我主张禁烟，这是因为它在减少煤烟型污染和疾病的风险上产生的效果。我希望吸烟者和非吸烟者都将能够和平友爱地分享公共场所，并且自由自在地享受外面的世界。

你重复了几段，我就没再翻那几段哈。

Answer 3

点击http://www.hao123.com/ss/fy.htm。一段一段的输入，较为准确。